TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinician and client views of utilising early supported discharge services
AU - Kraut, Jacqueline Claire
AU - Singer, Barby
AU - Singer, Kevin
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - © MA Healthcare Ltd.Background/Aims: To explore the beliefs and attitudes of potential referrers and referrees regarding the possible utilisation of early supported discharge (ESD) prior to hospital discharge. Methods: Semi-standardised one-to-one interviews were conducted with nine consultants and ten dyads, comprising inpatients and corresponding treating staff members involved in referral of these patients to ESD. Content analysis was completed to identify key themes and to group the data into categories. Results: Rehabilitation consultants reported safety and the ability to manage at home were the primary considerations in ESD referral decision making. Most patients were extremely likely to agree to referral to ESD. Four main categories were identified in the responses from the patient/staff dyads, which were summarised as: positive and negative aspects of ESD, and barriers and enablers to early discharge. Patients were only willing to return home with ESD once they were ambulant in some capacity. Staff identified considerably more potential disadvantages, and fewer benefits than patients with regard to early discharge. However, there was no indication that staff beliefs had a negative influence on patient views regarding their participation in ESD. Conclusions: Patients and staff generally approved of ESD services; however, staff may need to place greater consideration on advantages, such as the potential emotional and mental benefits that some patients associate with returning home sooner with ESD.
AB - © MA Healthcare Ltd.Background/Aims: To explore the beliefs and attitudes of potential referrers and referrees regarding the possible utilisation of early supported discharge (ESD) prior to hospital discharge. Methods: Semi-standardised one-to-one interviews were conducted with nine consultants and ten dyads, comprising inpatients and corresponding treating staff members involved in referral of these patients to ESD. Content analysis was completed to identify key themes and to group the data into categories. Results: Rehabilitation consultants reported safety and the ability to manage at home were the primary considerations in ESD referral decision making. Most patients were extremely likely to agree to referral to ESD. Four main categories were identified in the responses from the patient/staff dyads, which were summarised as: positive and negative aspects of ESD, and barriers and enablers to early discharge. Patients were only willing to return home with ESD once they were ambulant in some capacity. Staff identified considerably more potential disadvantages, and fewer benefits than patients with regard to early discharge. However, there was no indication that staff beliefs had a negative influence on patient views regarding their participation in ESD. Conclusions: Patients and staff generally approved of ESD services; however, staff may need to place greater consideration on advantages, such as the potential emotional and mental benefits that some patients associate with returning home sooner with ESD.
U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.10.464
DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.10.464
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-1645
VL - 23
SP - 464
EP - 471
JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
IS - 10
ER -