Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences

Petra Tschakert, Jon Barnett, Neville Ellis, Carmen Lawrence, Nancy Tuana, Mark New, Carmen Elrick-Barr, Ram Pandit, David Pannell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is seeking to prepare for losses arising from climate change. This is an emerging issue that challenges climate science and policy to engage more deeply with values, places, and people's experiences. We first provide insight into the UNFCCC framing of loss and damage and current approaches to valuation. We then draw on the growing literature on value- and place-based approaches to adaptation, including limits to adaptation, which examines loss as nuanced and sensitive to the nature of people's lives. Complementary perspectives from human geography, psychology, philosophy, economics, and ecology underscore the importance of understanding what matters to people and what they may likely consider to constitute loss. A significant body of knowledge illustrates that loss is often given meaning through lived, embodied, and place-based experiences, and so is more felt than tangible. We end with insights into recent scholarship that addresses how people make trade-offs between different value priorities. This emerging literature offers an opening in the academic debate to further advance a relational framing of loss in which trade-offs between lived values are seen as dynamic elements in a prospective loss space. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere476
Number of pages19
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: WIREs Climate Change
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

@article{f68eae4f383c4b49bfb1c43680855c45,
title = "Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences",
abstract = "The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is seeking to prepare for losses arising from climate change. This is an emerging issue that challenges climate science and policy to engage more deeply with values, places, and people's experiences. We first provide insight into the UNFCCC framing of loss and damage and current approaches to valuation. We then draw on the growing literature on value- and place-based approaches to adaptation, including limits to adaptation, which examines loss as nuanced and sensitive to the nature of people's lives. Complementary perspectives from human geography, psychology, philosophy, economics, and ecology underscore the importance of understanding what matters to people and what they may likely consider to constitute loss. A significant body of knowledge illustrates that loss is often given meaning through lived, embodied, and place-based experiences, and so is more felt than tangible. We end with insights into recent scholarship that addresses how people make trade-offs between different value priorities. This emerging literature offers an opening in the academic debate to further advance a relational framing of loss in which trade-offs between lived values are seen as dynamic elements in a prospective loss space. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
author = "Petra Tschakert and Jon Barnett and Neville Ellis and Carmen Lawrence and Nancy Tuana and Mark New and Carmen Elrick-Barr and Ram Pandit and David Pannell",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/wcc.476",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "WIREs Climate Change",
issn = "1757-7780",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5",

}

Climate change and loss, as if people mattered : values, places, and experiences. / Tschakert, Petra; Barnett, Jon; Ellis, Neville; Lawrence, Carmen; Tuana, Nancy; New, Mark; Elrick-Barr, Carmen; Pandit, Ram; Pannell, David.

In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: WIREs Climate Change, Vol. 8, No. 5, e476, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate change and loss, as if people mattered

T2 - WIREs Climate Change

AU - Tschakert, Petra

AU - Barnett, Jon

AU - Ellis, Neville

AU - Lawrence, Carmen

AU - Tuana, Nancy

AU - New, Mark

AU - Elrick-Barr, Carmen

AU - Pandit, Ram

AU - Pannell, David

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is seeking to prepare for losses arising from climate change. This is an emerging issue that challenges climate science and policy to engage more deeply with values, places, and people's experiences. We first provide insight into the UNFCCC framing of loss and damage and current approaches to valuation. We then draw on the growing literature on value- and place-based approaches to adaptation, including limits to adaptation, which examines loss as nuanced and sensitive to the nature of people's lives. Complementary perspectives from human geography, psychology, philosophy, economics, and ecology underscore the importance of understanding what matters to people and what they may likely consider to constitute loss. A significant body of knowledge illustrates that loss is often given meaning through lived, embodied, and place-based experiences, and so is more felt than tangible. We end with insights into recent scholarship that addresses how people make trade-offs between different value priorities. This emerging literature offers an opening in the academic debate to further advance a relational framing of loss in which trade-offs between lived values are seen as dynamic elements in a prospective loss space. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AB - The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is seeking to prepare for losses arising from climate change. This is an emerging issue that challenges climate science and policy to engage more deeply with values, places, and people's experiences. We first provide insight into the UNFCCC framing of loss and damage and current approaches to valuation. We then draw on the growing literature on value- and place-based approaches to adaptation, including limits to adaptation, which examines loss as nuanced and sensitive to the nature of people's lives. Complementary perspectives from human geography, psychology, philosophy, economics, and ecology underscore the importance of understanding what matters to people and what they may likely consider to constitute loss. A significant body of knowledge illustrates that loss is often given meaning through lived, embodied, and place-based experiences, and so is more felt than tangible. We end with insights into recent scholarship that addresses how people make trade-offs between different value priorities. This emerging literature offers an opening in the academic debate to further advance a relational framing of loss in which trade-offs between lived values are seen as dynamic elements in a prospective loss space. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

U2 - 10.1002/wcc.476

DO - 10.1002/wcc.476

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

JO - WIREs Climate Change

JF - WIREs Climate Change

SN - 1757-7780

IS - 5

M1 - e476

ER -