TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating tumour DNA predicts outcome form first-, but not second-line treatment and identifies melanoma patients who will benefit from combination immunotherapy
AU - Marsavela, Gabriela
AU - Lee, Jenny H. J.
AU - Calapre, Leslie
AU - Wong, Stephen Q.
AU - Pereira, Michelle R.
AU - McEvoy, Ashleigh C.
AU - Reid, Anna L
AU - Robinson, Cleo
AU - Warburton, Lydia
AU - Abed, Afaf
AU - Khattak, Adnan
AU - Meniawy, Tarek
AU - Dawson, Sarah Jane
AU - Sandhu, Shahneen Kaur
AU - Carlino, Matteo S.
AU - Menzies, Alexander M.
AU - Scolyer, Richard A
AU - Long, Georgina V.
AU - Amanuel, Benhur
AU - Millward, Michael
AU - Ziman, Melanie
AU - Rizos, Helen
AU - Gray, Elin
PY - 2020/11/15
Y1 - 2020/11/15
N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of pretreatment
ctDNA to inform therapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic
melanoma relative to type and line of treatment.
Experimental Design: Plasma circulating tumor DNA
(ctDNA) was quantified in 125 samples collected from 110
patients prior to commencing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as first- (n ¼ 32) or second-line (n ¼ 27)
regimens, or prior to commencing first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (n ¼ 66). An external validation cohort included 128
patients commencing ICI therapies in the first- (N ¼ 77) or
second-line (N ¼ 51) settings.
Results: In the discovery cohort, low ctDNA (≤20 copies/mL)
prior to commencing therapy predicted longer progression-free
survival (PFS) in patients treated with first-line ICIs [HR, 0.20; 95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.53; P < 0.0001], but not in the
second-line setting. An independent cohort validated that ctDNA is
predictive of PFS in the first-line setting (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–
0.83; P ¼ 0.006), but not in the second-line ICI setting. Moreover,
ctDNA prior to commencing ICI treatment was not predictive of
PFS for patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in either the
discovery or validation cohorts. Reduced PFS and overall survival
were observed in patients with high ctDNA receiving anti–PD-1
monotherapy, relative to those treated with combination anti–
CTLA-4/anti–PD-1 inhibitors.
Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA is a reliable indicator of
patient outcome in the first-line ICI treatment setting, but not in
the second-line ICI setting, especially in patients pretreated with
BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Preliminary evidence indicated that treatment-na€ve patients with high ctDNA may preferentially benefit
from combined ICIs.
AB - Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of pretreatment
ctDNA to inform therapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic
melanoma relative to type and line of treatment.
Experimental Design: Plasma circulating tumor DNA
(ctDNA) was quantified in 125 samples collected from 110
patients prior to commencing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as first- (n ¼ 32) or second-line (n ¼ 27)
regimens, or prior to commencing first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (n ¼ 66). An external validation cohort included 128
patients commencing ICI therapies in the first- (N ¼ 77) or
second-line (N ¼ 51) settings.
Results: In the discovery cohort, low ctDNA (≤20 copies/mL)
prior to commencing therapy predicted longer progression-free
survival (PFS) in patients treated with first-line ICIs [HR, 0.20; 95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.53; P < 0.0001], but not in the
second-line setting. An independent cohort validated that ctDNA is
predictive of PFS in the first-line setting (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–
0.83; P ¼ 0.006), but not in the second-line ICI setting. Moreover,
ctDNA prior to commencing ICI treatment was not predictive of
PFS for patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in either the
discovery or validation cohorts. Reduced PFS and overall survival
were observed in patients with high ctDNA receiving anti–PD-1
monotherapy, relative to those treated with combination anti–
CTLA-4/anti–PD-1 inhibitors.
Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA is a reliable indicator of
patient outcome in the first-line ICI treatment setting, but not in
the second-line ICI setting, especially in patients pretreated with
BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Preliminary evidence indicated that treatment-na€ve patients with high ctDNA may preferentially benefit
from combined ICIs.
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2251
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2251
M3 - Article
C2 - 33067256
VL - 26
SP - 5926
EP - 5933
JO - Clinical Cancer Reserach
JF - Clinical Cancer Reserach
SN - 1078-0432
IS - 22
ER -