China in Australia: The Discourses of Changst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

China matters significantly to contemporary Australia in terms of trade relations, capital movements, education and global order. Australian public discourse on China, however, inhabits two conflicting parallel universes, one a narrative of economic complementarity, the other of fear and anxiety. The spectre of the rise of China haunts Australian society in and among these two spheres: one in which China’s economic rise is to be encouraged as a sign of it joining the capitalist world system, and the other in which China’s ascent is regarded as a threat to be contained. The paper examines this problematic discourse, calling it Changst [China angst], arguing that it is permeated with a developmentalist logic (Chakrabarty, 2000) that misreads China through the homogenising history of both capitalism and Eurocentrism. This reading of China as but a copy of Western capitalism evokes anxiety because its distinctive forms of capital flow disrupt the comforting teleology. Equally, when Chinese society, including its education system, is perceived as not-yet modern, this induces fear of cultural contamination from the outpouring of Chinese international students. The exploration of this anxiety is conducted via six Australian case studies, showing how China’s engagement with Australia produces intense but unwarranted angst.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-341
JournalAsian Studies Review
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

China
discourse
anxiety
capital movement
capitalist society
Eurocentrism
teleology
Angst
Discourse
trade relation
environmental pollution
education system
economics
threat
narrative
history
Anxiety
education
student
Society

Cite this

@article{32841ca34bf64614b824ee4f518a980f,
title = "China in Australia: The Discourses of Changst",
abstract = "China matters significantly to contemporary Australia in terms of trade relations, capital movements, education and global order. Australian public discourse on China, however, inhabits two conflicting parallel universes, one a narrative of economic complementarity, the other of fear and anxiety. The spectre of the rise of China haunts Australian society in and among these two spheres: one in which China’s economic rise is to be encouraged as a sign of it joining the capitalist world system, and the other in which China’s ascent is regarded as a threat to be contained. The paper examines this problematic discourse, calling it Changst [China angst], arguing that it is permeated with a developmentalist logic (Chakrabarty, 2000) that misreads China through the homogenising history of both capitalism and Eurocentrism. This reading of China as but a copy of Western capitalism evokes anxiety because its distinctive forms of capital flow disrupt the comforting teleology. Equally, when Chinese society, including its education system, is perceived as not-yet modern, this induces fear of cultural contamination from the outpouring of Chinese international students. The exploration of this anxiety is conducted via six Australian case studies, showing how China’s engagement with Australia produces intense but unwarranted angst.",
keywords = "Rise of China; developmentalism; Chinese investment; Chinese students; sinophobia",
author = "McCarthy, {Gregory Michael} and Xianlin Song",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10357823.2018.1440531",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "323--341",
journal = "Asian Studies Review",
issn = "1035-7823",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

China in Australia: The Discourses of Changst. / McCarthy, Gregory Michael; Song, Xianlin.

In: Asian Studies Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 323-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - China in Australia: The Discourses of Changst

AU - McCarthy, Gregory Michael

AU - Song, Xianlin

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - China matters significantly to contemporary Australia in terms of trade relations, capital movements, education and global order. Australian public discourse on China, however, inhabits two conflicting parallel universes, one a narrative of economic complementarity, the other of fear and anxiety. The spectre of the rise of China haunts Australian society in and among these two spheres: one in which China’s economic rise is to be encouraged as a sign of it joining the capitalist world system, and the other in which China’s ascent is regarded as a threat to be contained. The paper examines this problematic discourse, calling it Changst [China angst], arguing that it is permeated with a developmentalist logic (Chakrabarty, 2000) that misreads China through the homogenising history of both capitalism and Eurocentrism. This reading of China as but a copy of Western capitalism evokes anxiety because its distinctive forms of capital flow disrupt the comforting teleology. Equally, when Chinese society, including its education system, is perceived as not-yet modern, this induces fear of cultural contamination from the outpouring of Chinese international students. The exploration of this anxiety is conducted via six Australian case studies, showing how China’s engagement with Australia produces intense but unwarranted angst.

AB - China matters significantly to contemporary Australia in terms of trade relations, capital movements, education and global order. Australian public discourse on China, however, inhabits two conflicting parallel universes, one a narrative of economic complementarity, the other of fear and anxiety. The spectre of the rise of China haunts Australian society in and among these two spheres: one in which China’s economic rise is to be encouraged as a sign of it joining the capitalist world system, and the other in which China’s ascent is regarded as a threat to be contained. The paper examines this problematic discourse, calling it Changst [China angst], arguing that it is permeated with a developmentalist logic (Chakrabarty, 2000) that misreads China through the homogenising history of both capitalism and Eurocentrism. This reading of China as but a copy of Western capitalism evokes anxiety because its distinctive forms of capital flow disrupt the comforting teleology. Equally, when Chinese society, including its education system, is perceived as not-yet modern, this induces fear of cultural contamination from the outpouring of Chinese international students. The exploration of this anxiety is conducted via six Australian case studies, showing how China’s engagement with Australia produces intense but unwarranted angst.

KW - Rise of China; developmentalism; Chinese investment; Chinese students; sinophobia

U2 - 10.1080/10357823.2018.1440531

DO - 10.1080/10357823.2018.1440531

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 323

EP - 341

JO - Asian Studies Review

JF - Asian Studies Review

SN - 1035-7823

IS - 2

ER -