Chapitre 3. Horizontal Exchange, Relations, and Resistance in Bioart and Practice-based Research

WhiteFeather Hunter, Maya Hey, Emilie St-Hiliare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Bioart sits at the intersection of two relatively elite fields of knowledge specialization and production: Biotechnology and Art. These specializations occupy different strata of the academic hierarchy, requiring credentials and disciplinary rigour that, historically, have tended to validate delineated specificities instead of similarities in research; in turn, these areas of expertise privilege credentialed mastery over other ways of knowing. With its overlap of the arts and the sciences, how might bioart function to flatten existing hierarchies and foster more horizontally collaborative methods towards a shared and critical understanding of bioethics? This paper builds on the notion of horizontal collaboration theorized by Couture et al. (2017), critically attending to the ruptures and resistances (real, perceived, and constructed) that occur when working transversally within verticalized institutions. Combining theoretical interventions with practice-based case studies that deconstruct spaces of bio-artistic inquiry – from the lab or studio to kitchens, classrooms, and galleries – this paper aims to build ‘good’ relations according to Joanna Zylinska’s definition of a body compounding it’s relation to another, thereby increasing the power of both.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-89
Number of pages21
JournalJournal International de Bioethique
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Chapitre 3. Horizontal Exchange, Relations, and Resistance in Bioart and Practice-based Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this