Changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia

Thomas Riley, J.W. Pearman, I.L. Rouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Citations (Web of Science)


Objective: To assess the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Western Australia.Design: Retrospective review of statutory notification data.Setting: Western Australia (WA), 1993.Outcome measures: Notification rates, antibiotic resistance patterns and classification of isolates as imported or WA MRSA strains on the basis of antibiotic susceptibility.Results: There were 204 notifications of MRSA, 78% of which were classified as WA MRSA. Three outbreaks of MRSA infection and colonisation occurred in separate WA hospitals. Notification rats per 100 000 were highest in the rural regions: the Kimberley (86.32), Goldfields (62.47), Mid West (37.21) and Pilbara (27.38) regions; and lowest in the metropolitan regions (5.52). All MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. Most imported strains were susceptible to amikacin, bacitracin, chloramphenicol, framycetin, fusidic acid and novobiocin, but only 23% to gentamicin. WA MRSA strains remained predominantly susceptible to all antibiotics tested, except beta-lactams, erythromycin and tetracycline, but a few strains resistant to rifampicin (1%) and fusidic acid (3%) appeared in the second half of 1993.Conclusions: The epidemiology of MRSA in WA is changing rapidly, with increases in both the numbers of notifications and the proportion from country regions. A new strain of MRSA (WA MRSA) that is less resistant to antibiotics than imported MRSA has emerged and is threatening the State's success in preventing establishment of MRSA in its hospitals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-414
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Publication statusPublished - 1995


Dive into the research topics of 'Changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this