Centripetalism and electoral moderation in established democracies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Centripetal approaches to ethnic conflict management seek to promote inter-ethnic accommodation and moderation by making politicians dependent on the electoral support of groups other than their own base. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of such approaches, including which kinds of electoral systems can best promote moderate and centrist politics in deeply divided societies. Neglected in this debate, however, has been the experience of ethnically diverse established democracies utilizing centripetal electoral models. This article examines historical evidence from Australia, and recent natural experiments with subnational electoral reform in the United States, which lend support to centripetal claims that preferential, “ranked choice” or “instant runoff” voting can encourage electoral moderation and address political polarization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-221
Number of pages21
JournalNationalism and Ethnic Politics
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

conflict management
ethnic conflict
electoral system
polarization
democracy
accommodation
voting
politician
reform
politics
experiment
society
evidence
experience
Group
runoff

Cite this

@article{f08be6675494450593b00bdd818afc00,
title = "Centripetalism and electoral moderation in established democracies",
abstract = "Centripetal approaches to ethnic conflict management seek to promote inter-ethnic accommodation and moderation by making politicians dependent on the electoral support of groups other than their own base. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of such approaches, including which kinds of electoral systems can best promote moderate and centrist politics in deeply divided societies. Neglected in this debate, however, has been the experience of ethnically diverse established democracies utilizing centripetal electoral models. This article examines historical evidence from Australia, and recent natural experiments with subnational electoral reform in the United States, which lend support to centripetal claims that preferential, “ranked choice” or “instant runoff” voting can encourage electoral moderation and address political polarization.",
keywords = "ALTERNATIVE VOTE, NORTHERN-IRELAND, ETHNIC-CONFLICT, SOCIETIES, SYSTEMS",
author = "Benjamin Reilly",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13537113.2018.1457827",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "201--221",
journal = "Nationalism and Ethnic Politics",
issn = "1353-7113",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Centripetalism and electoral moderation in established democracies. / Reilly, Benjamin.

In: Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 201-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centripetalism and electoral moderation in established democracies

AU - Reilly, Benjamin

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - Centripetal approaches to ethnic conflict management seek to promote inter-ethnic accommodation and moderation by making politicians dependent on the electoral support of groups other than their own base. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of such approaches, including which kinds of electoral systems can best promote moderate and centrist politics in deeply divided societies. Neglected in this debate, however, has been the experience of ethnically diverse established democracies utilizing centripetal electoral models. This article examines historical evidence from Australia, and recent natural experiments with subnational electoral reform in the United States, which lend support to centripetal claims that preferential, “ranked choice” or “instant runoff” voting can encourage electoral moderation and address political polarization.

AB - Centripetal approaches to ethnic conflict management seek to promote inter-ethnic accommodation and moderation by making politicians dependent on the electoral support of groups other than their own base. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of such approaches, including which kinds of electoral systems can best promote moderate and centrist politics in deeply divided societies. Neglected in this debate, however, has been the experience of ethnically diverse established democracies utilizing centripetal electoral models. This article examines historical evidence from Australia, and recent natural experiments with subnational electoral reform in the United States, which lend support to centripetal claims that preferential, “ranked choice” or “instant runoff” voting can encourage electoral moderation and address political polarization.

KW - ALTERNATIVE VOTE

KW - NORTHERN-IRELAND

KW - ETHNIC-CONFLICT

KW - SOCIETIES

KW - SYSTEMS

U2 - 10.1080/13537113.2018.1457827

DO - 10.1080/13537113.2018.1457827

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 201

EP - 221

JO - Nationalism and Ethnic Politics

JF - Nationalism and Ethnic Politics

SN - 1353-7113

IS - 2

ER -