Centralization and prospective audit of cystectomy are necessary: a commentary on the case for centralization, supported by a contemporary series utilizing the ANZUP cystectomy database

Pravin Viswambaram, Steve P. McCombie, Cynthia Hawks, D. Michael A. Wallace, Shomik Sengupta, Dickon Hayne

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) outcomes are unacceptably poor. In Australia, BC survival is actually deteriorating. There is an urgent need to improve outcomes in BC patients, which requires a multipronged approach. One area deserving closer scrutiny is radical cystectomy. Audit is necessary to identify areas for improvement and without it, outcomes remain unknown. Evidence convincingly shows high-volume surgeons and centers improve cystectomy outcomes including overall survival, yet centralization has still not occurred. The Australia and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group cystectomy database has been established to facilitate cystectomy audit in Australia and New Zealand. We present initial data from the ANZUP cystectomy database from a single high-volume center, discuss the benefits of centralization and its challenges in the Asia-Pacific context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-295
Number of pages6
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date9 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Centralization and prospective audit of cystectomy are necessary: a commentary on the case for centralization, supported by a contemporary series utilizing the ANZUP cystectomy database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this