TY - JOUR
T1 - CD1d-restricted NKT cells: an interstrain comparison
AU - Hammond, K.J.L.
AU - Pellicci, D.G.
AU - Poulton, L.D.
AU - Naidenko, O.V.
AU - Scalzo, Tony
AU - Baxter, A.G.
AU - Godfrey, D.I.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - CD1d-restricted V alpha 14-J alpha 281 invariant alpha beta TCR+ (NKT) cells are well defined in the C57BL/6 mouse strain, but they remain poorly characterized in non-NK1.1-expressing strains. Surrogate markers for NKT cells such as alpha beta TCR(+)CD4(-)CD8(-) and DX5(+)CD3(+) have been used in many studies, although their effectiveness in defining this lineage remains to be verified. Here, we compare NKT cells among C57BL/6, NK1.1-congenic BALB/c, and NK1.1-congenic nonobese diabetic mice. NKT cells were identified and compared using a range of approaches: NK1.1 expression, surrogate phenotypes used in previous studies, labeling with CD1d/alpha -galactosylceramide tetramers, and cytokine production. Our results demonstrate that NKT cells and their CD4/ CD8-defined subsets are present in all three strains, and confirm that nonobese diabetic mice have a numerical and functional deficiency in these cells. We also highlight the hazards of using surrogate phenotypes, none of which accurately identify NKT cells, and one in particular (DX5(+)CD3(+)) actually excludes these cells. Finally, our results support the concept that NK1.1 expression may not be an ideal marker for CD1d-restricted NKT cells, many of which are NK1.1-negative, especially within the CD4(+) subset and particularly in NK1.1-congenic BALB/c mice.
AB - CD1d-restricted V alpha 14-J alpha 281 invariant alpha beta TCR+ (NKT) cells are well defined in the C57BL/6 mouse strain, but they remain poorly characterized in non-NK1.1-expressing strains. Surrogate markers for NKT cells such as alpha beta TCR(+)CD4(-)CD8(-) and DX5(+)CD3(+) have been used in many studies, although their effectiveness in defining this lineage remains to be verified. Here, we compare NKT cells among C57BL/6, NK1.1-congenic BALB/c, and NK1.1-congenic nonobese diabetic mice. NKT cells were identified and compared using a range of approaches: NK1.1 expression, surrogate phenotypes used in previous studies, labeling with CD1d/alpha -galactosylceramide tetramers, and cytokine production. Our results demonstrate that NKT cells and their CD4/ CD8-defined subsets are present in all three strains, and confirm that nonobese diabetic mice have a numerical and functional deficiency in these cells. We also highlight the hazards of using surrogate phenotypes, none of which accurately identify NKT cells, and one in particular (DX5(+)CD3(+)) actually excludes these cells. Finally, our results support the concept that NK1.1 expression may not be an ideal marker for CD1d-restricted NKT cells, many of which are NK1.1-negative, especially within the CD4(+) subset and particularly in NK1.1-congenic BALB/c mice.
U2 - 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1164
DO - 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1164
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-1767
VL - 167
SP - 1164
EP - 1173
JO - Journal of Immunology
JF - Journal of Immunology
ER -