TY - JOUR
T1 - Busy and confused? High risk of missed alerts in the cockpit
T2 - An electrophysiological study
AU - Causse, Mickael
AU - Parmentier, Fabrice B.R.
AU - Mouratille, Damien
AU - Thibaut, Dorothée
AU - Kisselenko, Marie
AU - Fabre, Eve
N1 - Funding Information:
Fabrice Parmentier was supported by research grant PID2020-114117 GB-I00 funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN), the Spanish State Agency for Research (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “A Way of Making Europe”. The authors would like to thank Johanna Clerc for her help with data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/10/15
Y1 - 2022/10/15
N2 - The ability to react to unexpected auditory stimuli is critical in complex settings such as aircraft cockpits or air traffic control towers, characterized by high mental load and highly complex auditory environments (i.e., many different auditory alerts). Evidence shows that both factors can negatively impact auditory attention and prevent appropriate reactions. In the present study, 60 participants performed a simulated aviation task varying in terms of mental load (no, low, high) concurrently to a tone detection paradigm in which the complexity of the auditory environment (i.e., auditory load) was manipulated (1, 2 or 3 different tones). We measured both detection performance (miss, false alarm, d’) and brain activity (event-related potentials) associated with the target tone. Our results showed that both mental and auditory loads affected target tone detection performance. Importantly, their combined effects had a large impact on the percentage of missed target tones. While, in the no mental load condition, miss rate was very low with 1 (0.53%) and 2 tones (1.11%), it increased drastically with 3 tones (24.44%), and this effect was accentuated as mental load increased, yielding to the higher miss rate in the 3-tone paradigm under high mental load conditions (68.64%). Increased mental and auditory loads and miss rates were associated with disrupted brain responses to the target tone, as shown by a reduced P3b amplitude. In sum, our results highlight the importance of balancing mental and auditory loads to maintain efficient reactions to alarms in complex working environment.
AB - The ability to react to unexpected auditory stimuli is critical in complex settings such as aircraft cockpits or air traffic control towers, characterized by high mental load and highly complex auditory environments (i.e., many different auditory alerts). Evidence shows that both factors can negatively impact auditory attention and prevent appropriate reactions. In the present study, 60 participants performed a simulated aviation task varying in terms of mental load (no, low, high) concurrently to a tone detection paradigm in which the complexity of the auditory environment (i.e., auditory load) was manipulated (1, 2 or 3 different tones). We measured both detection performance (miss, false alarm, d’) and brain activity (event-related potentials) associated with the target tone. Our results showed that both mental and auditory loads affected target tone detection performance. Importantly, their combined effects had a large impact on the percentage of missed target tones. While, in the no mental load condition, miss rate was very low with 1 (0.53%) and 2 tones (1.11%), it increased drastically with 3 tones (24.44%), and this effect was accentuated as mental load increased, yielding to the higher miss rate in the 3-tone paradigm under high mental load conditions (68.64%). Increased mental and auditory loads and miss rates were associated with disrupted brain responses to the target tone, as shown by a reduced P3b amplitude. In sum, our results highlight the importance of balancing mental and auditory loads to maintain efficient reactions to alarms in complex working environment.
KW - Alarm profusion
KW - Auditory load
KW - ERPs
KW - Mental workload
KW - Missed alerts
KW - P300
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135392061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148035
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148035
M3 - Article
C2 - 35908589
AN - SCOPUS:85135392061
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1793
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
M1 - 148035
ER -