Brief Report: Real-World Toxicity and Survival of Combination Immunotherapy in Pleural Mesothelioma—RIOMeso

  • Nicholas McNamee
  • , Catriona Harvey
  • , Lauren Gray
  • , Trisha Khoo
  • , Lavanya Lingam
  • , Betty Zhang
  • , Udit Nindra
  • , Po Yee Yip
  • , Abhijit Pal
  • , Timothy Clay
  • , Surein Arulananda
  • , Malinda Itchins
  • , Nick Pavlakis
  • , Steven Kao
  • , Samantha Bowyer
  • , Venessa Chin
  • , Lydia Warburton
  • , Inês Pires da Silva
  • , Thomas John
  • , Benjamin Solomon
  • Marliese Alexander, Adnan Nagrial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Australia has one of the highest rates of asbestos-associated diseases. Mesothelioma remains an area of unmet need with a 5-year overall survival of 10%. First-line immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is now a standard of care for unresectable pleural mesothelioma following the CheckMate 743 trial, with supportive data from the later line single-arm MAPS2 trial. RIOMeso evaluates survival and toxicity of this regimen in real-world practice. Methods: Demographic and clinicopathologic data of Australian patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab in first- and subsequent-line settings for pleural mesothelioma were collected retrospectively. Survival was reported using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups with the log-rank test. Toxicity was investigator assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 119 patients were identified from 11 centers. The median age was 72 years, 83% were male, 92% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group less than or equal to 1, 50% were past or current smokers, and 78% had known asbestos exposure. In addition, 50% were epithelioid, 19% sarcomatoid, 14% biphasic, and 17% unavailable. Ipilimumab and nivolumab were used first line in 75% of patients. Median overall survival (mOS) was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.0–not reached [NR]) for the entire cohort. For patients treated first line, mOS was 14.5 months (95% CI: 12.5–NR) and in second- or later-line patients was 15.4 months (95% CI: 11.2–NR). There was no statistically significant difference in mOS for epithelioid patients compared with nonepithelioid (19.1 mo [95% CI: 15.4–NR] versus 13.0 mo [95% CI: 9.7–NR], respectively, p = 0.064). Furthermore, 24% of the patients had a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events, including three treatment-related deaths. Colitis was the most frequent adverse event. Conclusions: Combination immunotherapy in real-world practice has poorer survival outcomes and seems more toxic compared with clinical trial data. This is the first detailed report of real-world survival and toxicity outcomes using ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment of pleural mesothelioma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-642
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brief Report: Real-World Toxicity and Survival of Combination Immunotherapy in Pleural Mesothelioma—RIOMeso'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this