TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast cancer recurrence following active treatment
T2 - Determining its incidence in the NSW population
AU - Kemp-Casey, Anna
AU - Roughead, Elizabeth E.
AU - Saunders, Christobel
AU - Boyle, Frances
AU - Lopez, Derrick
AU - Bulsara, Mahesh
AU - Preen, David B.
PY - 2016/1/28
Y1 - 2016/1/28
N2 - Objectives: It is important for consumers, clinicians and health service planners to know the risk of recurrence of primary breast cancer after initial treatment. At present, none of Australia's state or territory cancer registries routinely report this information. We aimed to determine the incidence of recurrence in New South Wales (NSW) clinical practice for the period 18 months to 6 years after diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Study type: Retrospective cohort study using population-based linked health data. Methods: We identifed 2416 women in the 45 and Up Study who were diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 2003 and 2008 in NSW, and who had not had a recurrence 18 months after diagnosis. Unit-level hospital, pharmacy and outpatient medical claims were used to identify treatment for recurrence. Incidence of recurrence was calculated using individual person-time at risk (18 months to 6 years postdiagnosis), with follow-up censored for death or end of study period (median follow-up 3 years). Time to recurrence was calculated, and Cox proportional regression was used to identify women's baseline and active treatment characteristics that were predictive of recurrence up to 6 years postdiagnosis. Results: 217 women (9%) had a hospital, pharmacy or outpatient claim indicating breast cancer recurrence. Overall annual incidence of recurrence was 3.3%. Recurrence rates were signifcantly higher for women with nodepositive (4.8% vs 2.5% annually; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% confdence interval [95% CI] 1.3, 2.3) or hormone receptor-negative tumours (3.8% vs 3.1% annually; HR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0, 1.7). Women with tumours >2 cm at diagnosis were more likely to experience recurrence than women with smaller/unknown tumours (4.8% vs 2.7% annually; HR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.1, 2.0). Conclusions: A combination of routinely collected administrative health datasets can be used to determine recurrence rates, allowing future assessment of population-level changes over time and investigations of the real-world impact of specifc treatments on outcomes.
AB - Objectives: It is important for consumers, clinicians and health service planners to know the risk of recurrence of primary breast cancer after initial treatment. At present, none of Australia's state or territory cancer registries routinely report this information. We aimed to determine the incidence of recurrence in New South Wales (NSW) clinical practice for the period 18 months to 6 years after diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Study type: Retrospective cohort study using population-based linked health data. Methods: We identifed 2416 women in the 45 and Up Study who were diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 2003 and 2008 in NSW, and who had not had a recurrence 18 months after diagnosis. Unit-level hospital, pharmacy and outpatient medical claims were used to identify treatment for recurrence. Incidence of recurrence was calculated using individual person-time at risk (18 months to 6 years postdiagnosis), with follow-up censored for death or end of study period (median follow-up 3 years). Time to recurrence was calculated, and Cox proportional regression was used to identify women's baseline and active treatment characteristics that were predictive of recurrence up to 6 years postdiagnosis. Results: 217 women (9%) had a hospital, pharmacy or outpatient claim indicating breast cancer recurrence. Overall annual incidence of recurrence was 3.3%. Recurrence rates were signifcantly higher for women with nodepositive (4.8% vs 2.5% annually; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% confdence interval [95% CI] 1.3, 2.3) or hormone receptor-negative tumours (3.8% vs 3.1% annually; HR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0, 1.7). Women with tumours >2 cm at diagnosis were more likely to experience recurrence than women with smaller/unknown tumours (4.8% vs 2.7% annually; HR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.1, 2.0). Conclusions: A combination of routinely collected administrative health datasets can be used to determine recurrence rates, allowing future assessment of population-level changes over time and investigations of the real-world impact of specifc treatments on outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994169044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17061/phrp2611607
DO - 10.17061/phrp2611607
M3 - Article
C2 - 26863170
VL - 26
JO - Public Health Research & Practice
JF - Public Health Research & Practice
SN - 2204-2091
IS - 1
M1 - e2611607
ER -