TY - JOUR
T1 - Birth order and myopia
AU - Guggenheim, J.A.
AU - Mcmahon, G.
AU - Northstone, K.
AU - Mandel, Y.
AU - Kaiserman, I.
AU - Stone, R.A.
AU - Lin, X.
AU - Saw, S.
AU - Forward, Hannah
AU - Mackey, David
AU - Yazar, S.
AU - Young, T.
AU - Williams, C.E.C.S.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Purpose: An association between birth order and reduced unaided vision (a surrogate for myopia) has been observed previously. We examined the association between birth order and myopia directly in four subject groups. Methods: Subject groups were participants in (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; UK; age 15 years; N=4401), (2) the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM; Singapore; age 13 years; N=1959), (3) the Raine Eye Health Study (REHS; Australia; age 20 years; N=1344), and (4) Israeli Defense Force Pre-recruitment Candidates (IDFC; Israel; age 16-22 years; N=888,277). The main outcome was odds ratios (OR) for myopia in first-born versus non-first-born individuals after adjusting for potential risk factors. Results: The prevalence of myopia was numerically higher in first-born versus non-first-born individuals in all study groups, but the strength of evidence varied widely. Adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals, CIs) were: ALSPAC, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); SCORM, 1.25 (0.89-1.77); REHS, 1.18 (0.90-1.55); and IDFC, 1.04 (1.03-1.06). In the large IDFC sample, the effect size was greater (a) for the first-born versus fourth- or higher-born comparison than for the first-born versus second/third-born comparison (p4000 participants provided strong statistical support for the association. The available evidence suggested the relationship was independent of established risk factors such as time outdoors/reading, and thus may arise through a different causal mechanism. © 2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
AB - Purpose: An association between birth order and reduced unaided vision (a surrogate for myopia) has been observed previously. We examined the association between birth order and myopia directly in four subject groups. Methods: Subject groups were participants in (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; UK; age 15 years; N=4401), (2) the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM; Singapore; age 13 years; N=1959), (3) the Raine Eye Health Study (REHS; Australia; age 20 years; N=1344), and (4) Israeli Defense Force Pre-recruitment Candidates (IDFC; Israel; age 16-22 years; N=888,277). The main outcome was odds ratios (OR) for myopia in first-born versus non-first-born individuals after adjusting for potential risk factors. Results: The prevalence of myopia was numerically higher in first-born versus non-first-born individuals in all study groups, but the strength of evidence varied widely. Adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals, CIs) were: ALSPAC, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); SCORM, 1.25 (0.89-1.77); REHS, 1.18 (0.90-1.55); and IDFC, 1.04 (1.03-1.06). In the large IDFC sample, the effect size was greater (a) for the first-born versus fourth- or higher-born comparison than for the first-born versus second/third-born comparison (p4000 participants provided strong statistical support for the association. The available evidence suggested the relationship was independent of established risk factors such as time outdoors/reading, and thus may arise through a different causal mechanism. © 2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
U2 - 10.3109/09286586.2013.848457
DO - 10.3109/09286586.2013.848457
M3 - Article
SN - 0928-6586
VL - 20
SP - 375
EP - 384
JO - Ophthalmic Epidemiology
JF - Ophthalmic Epidemiology
IS - 6
ER -
