Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae)

Maximilian Lauterbach, Marie Claire Veranso-Libalah, Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Gudrun Kadereit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought-adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions.
Location: Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia.
Methods: Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using “BioGeoBEARS” under the DEC model.
Results: Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano‐Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with ITfr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II, which originated in the Western ITfr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean.
Main conclusions: Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the ITfr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3539-3552
Number of pages14
JournalEcology and Evolution
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Anabasis
Amaranthaceae
biogeography
floristics
Central Asia
Northern Africa
arid zones
West Asia
Miocene
C4 plants
Eurasia
arid region
chloroplast DNA
herbaria
introns
deserts
divergence
extremophile
drought
aridification

Cite this

Lauterbach, Maximilian ; Veranso-Libalah, Marie Claire ; Sukhorukov, Alexander P. ; Kadereit, Gudrun. / Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae). In: Ecology and Evolution. 2019 ; pp. 3539-3552.
@article{7c184a120d824c17ab94e1a229c47dc0,
title = "Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae)",
abstract = "Aim: Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought-adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions.Location: Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia.Methods: Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using “BioGeoBEARS” under the DEC model.Results: Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano‐Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with ITfr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II, which originated in the Western ITfr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean.Main conclusions: Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the ITfr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.",
author = "Maximilian Lauterbach and Veranso-Libalah, {Marie Claire} and Sukhorukov, {Alexander P.} and Gudrun Kadereit",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.4987",
language = "English",
pages = "3539--3552",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae). / Lauterbach, Maximilian; Veranso-Libalah, Marie Claire; Sukhorukov, Alexander P.; Kadereit, Gudrun.

In: Ecology and Evolution, 19.02.2019, p. 3539-3552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae)

AU - Lauterbach, Maximilian

AU - Veranso-Libalah, Marie Claire

AU - Sukhorukov, Alexander P.

AU - Kadereit, Gudrun

PY - 2019/2/19

Y1 - 2019/2/19

N2 - Aim: Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought-adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions.Location: Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia.Methods: Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using “BioGeoBEARS” under the DEC model.Results: Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano‐Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with ITfr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II, which originated in the Western ITfr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean.Main conclusions: Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the ITfr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.

AB - Aim: Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought-adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions.Location: Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia.Methods: Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using “BioGeoBEARS” under the DEC model.Results: Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano‐Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with ITfr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II, which originated in the Western ITfr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean.Main conclusions: Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the ITfr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.4987

DO - 10.1002/ece3.4987

M3 - Article

SP - 3539

EP - 3552

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

ER -