TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioeconomics of mud crab, Scyllaparamamosain, culture in Vietnam
AU - Petersen, Elizabeth
AU - Phuong, T.H.
AU - Van Dung, N.
AU - Giang, P.
AU - Dat, N.K.
AU - Tuan, V.A.
AU - Nghi, T.V.
AU - Glencross, B.D.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The results of bioeconomic analysis informed by a survey of 80 small-scale mud crab farmers in Vietnam are presented in this paper. Mud crab farming in Vietnam is profitable, with net revenue being approximately 135 and 41millionVND/year (USD 7000-USD 2100 per year) in the central and southern regions, respectively. Profitability was significantly higher in the centre compared with the north, as almost three times the biomass is harvested in the centre compared with the south (in turn, due to higher aquaculture area and survival rates). The benefit-cost ratio (the ratio between total revenue and total costs) is 3.55 in the centre and 1.97 in the south. The crabs are fed almost exclusively on low-value finfish in the centre and the south. Feeding rates were found to be low, with 95% of biomass gain coming from natural feed in the environment rather than supplementary feeding by the farmer. If pellets are to be adopted widely by mud crab farmers, negative perceptions regarding the poor adaptability of mud crab to pellets (northern farmers only), relatively slow growth rates compared with low-value finfish and lack of availability of pellets need to be overcome. © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
AB - The results of bioeconomic analysis informed by a survey of 80 small-scale mud crab farmers in Vietnam are presented in this paper. Mud crab farming in Vietnam is profitable, with net revenue being approximately 135 and 41millionVND/year (USD 7000-USD 2100 per year) in the central and southern regions, respectively. Profitability was significantly higher in the centre compared with the north, as almost three times the biomass is harvested in the centre compared with the south (in turn, due to higher aquaculture area and survival rates). The benefit-cost ratio (the ratio between total revenue and total costs) is 3.55 in the centre and 1.97 in the south. The crabs are fed almost exclusively on low-value finfish in the centre and the south. Feeding rates were found to be low, with 95% of biomass gain coming from natural feed in the environment rather than supplementary feeding by the farmer. If pellets are to be adopted widely by mud crab farmers, negative perceptions regarding the poor adaptability of mud crab to pellets (northern farmers only), relatively slow growth rates compared with low-value finfish and lack of availability of pellets need to be overcome. © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01073.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01073.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1753-5123
VL - 5
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Reviews in Aquaculture
JF - Reviews in Aquaculture
IS - 1
ER -