TY - JOUR
T1 - Biodiversity and agriculture
T2 - Production frontiers as a framework for exploring trade-offs and evaluating policy
AU - Smith, F. Patrick
AU - Gorddard, Russell
AU - House, Alan P. N.
AU - McIntyre, Sue
AU - Prober, Suzanne M.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Increasing global demand for agricultural products will continue to affect biodiversity. Various strategies to address this tension, such as payments for ecosystem services, wildlife-friendly farming, and conservation-reserve planning, emphasize different aspects of the system and different policy approaches. We argue that the strategic approach must be matched to the region. That is, land-use policy and research agendas focusing on improving agronomic and ecological functioning need to be coordinated, and informed by integrated knowledge about the ecological, agronomic and socio-economic characteristics of a region. We trial the use of agricultural-production and biodiversity-conservation possibility sets as an integrating framework. We find two benefits. First, the process of developing production possibility frontiers enables researchers from different disciplines to jointly identify and debate the critical types and scales of interactions among production and biodiversity where there exist opportunities for improving the system. Second, we demonstrate how the shape of the biodiversity-production trade-off frontier, and where existing landscapes sit in relation to it, can determine the effectiveness of a policy in achieving production and conservation goals. Production possibility frontiers therefore provide a simple, flexible tool for a critical trans-disciplinary appraisal of policy, and can guide the choice of more sophisticated approaches to managing agricultural landscapes. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Increasing global demand for agricultural products will continue to affect biodiversity. Various strategies to address this tension, such as payments for ecosystem services, wildlife-friendly farming, and conservation-reserve planning, emphasize different aspects of the system and different policy approaches. We argue that the strategic approach must be matched to the region. That is, land-use policy and research agendas focusing on improving agronomic and ecological functioning need to be coordinated, and informed by integrated knowledge about the ecological, agronomic and socio-economic characteristics of a region. We trial the use of agricultural-production and biodiversity-conservation possibility sets as an integrating framework. We find two benefits. First, the process of developing production possibility frontiers enables researchers from different disciplines to jointly identify and debate the critical types and scales of interactions among production and biodiversity where there exist opportunities for improving the system. Second, we demonstrate how the shape of the biodiversity-production trade-off frontier, and where existing landscapes sit in relation to it, can determine the effectiveness of a policy in achieving production and conservation goals. Production possibility frontiers therefore provide a simple, flexible tool for a critical trans-disciplinary appraisal of policy, and can guide the choice of more sophisticated approaches to managing agricultural landscapes. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Production possibility frontier
KW - Biodiversity conservation
KW - Agricultural production
KW - Agro-environmental policy
KW - PLANT-SPECIES RICHNESS
KW - LAND-USE CHANGE
KW - ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
KW - WESTERN-AUSTRALIA
KW - WHEAT-BELT
KW - CONSERVATION
KW - LANDSCAPES
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - AREA
KW - IMPLEMENTATION
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.013
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 23
SP - 85
EP - 94
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -