TY - JOUR
T1 - Bidirectional associations of intellectual and social activities with cognitive function among middle-aged and elderly adults in China
AU - Li, Xiaochun
AU - Zhang, Jiajia
AU - Hou, Rui
AU - Zheng, Manqi
AU - Singh, Manjot
AU - Li, Haibin
AU - Li, Changwei
AU - Zhang, Xiaoyu
AU - Yang, Xinghua
AU - Wu, Lijuan
AU - Wang, Youxin
AU - Zheng, Deqiang
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National major R&D projects of China-Scientific technological innovation 2030 [grant numbers 2021ZD0201801 and 2021ZD0201802 ], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81872682 ] and the Beijing Municipal Health System Special Funds of High-Level Medical Personnel Construction [grant number 2022-3-042 ].
Funding Information:
The authors thank the CHARLS research team and field team for collecting the data and making the data publicly accessible. The study was conducted with the informed consent of each participant and approved by the ethical committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015). The CHARLS dataset is freely available to all researchers. Researchers can gain access to the data at http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en. This study was supported by the National major R&D projects of China-Scientific technological innovation 2030 [grant numbers 2021ZD0201801 and 2021ZD0201802], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81872682] and the Beijing Municipal Health System Special Funds of High-Level Medical Personnel Construction [grant number 2022-3-042].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/12/15
Y1 - 2022/12/15
N2 - Background: Previous studies evaluating the association between leisure activities and cognitive function produced conflicting results. Different types of leisure activities may have different effects on cognition, and very few studies have explored their bidirectional associations. Our study aimed to explore whether intellectual and social activities had bidirectional associations with cognitive function among the middle-aged and elderly adults in China. Methods: Data was derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. The data in this study were based on 11,549 participants aged 45 or older whose intellectual and social activities and cognitive function were assessed at baseline. Cross-lagged panel model was used to examine the temporal relationship of intellectual and social activities with cognitive function. Results: Totally, 5624 participants completed the third follow-up in 2018. The results showed that the better the cognitive function they had at baseline, the more intellectual activities they were engage in (β = 0.044, P < 0.001) and vice versa (β = 0.042, P = 0.001). Additionally, better cognitive function at baseline was significantly associated with more engagement in social activities (β = 0.028, P = 0.030); in contrast, higher engagement in social activities at baseline was not related to better cognitive function (β = −0.008, P = 0.523). Limitations: Engagement in social and intellectual activities was assessed via questionnaire. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that there was a bidirectional relationship between intellectual activities and cognitive function. However, participation in social activities did not slow down the decline in cognitive function. Participating in intellectual activities, compared to social activities, is especially beneficial for cognitive function.
AB - Background: Previous studies evaluating the association between leisure activities and cognitive function produced conflicting results. Different types of leisure activities may have different effects on cognition, and very few studies have explored their bidirectional associations. Our study aimed to explore whether intellectual and social activities had bidirectional associations with cognitive function among the middle-aged and elderly adults in China. Methods: Data was derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. The data in this study were based on 11,549 participants aged 45 or older whose intellectual and social activities and cognitive function were assessed at baseline. Cross-lagged panel model was used to examine the temporal relationship of intellectual and social activities with cognitive function. Results: Totally, 5624 participants completed the third follow-up in 2018. The results showed that the better the cognitive function they had at baseline, the more intellectual activities they were engage in (β = 0.044, P < 0.001) and vice versa (β = 0.042, P = 0.001). Additionally, better cognitive function at baseline was significantly associated with more engagement in social activities (β = 0.028, P = 0.030); in contrast, higher engagement in social activities at baseline was not related to better cognitive function (β = −0.008, P = 0.523). Limitations: Engagement in social and intellectual activities was assessed via questionnaire. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that there was a bidirectional relationship between intellectual activities and cognitive function. However, participation in social activities did not slow down the decline in cognitive function. Participating in intellectual activities, compared to social activities, is especially beneficial for cognitive function.
KW - Bidirectional associations
KW - Cognitive function
KW - Cross-lagged panel model
KW - Intellectual activities
KW - Social activities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138576080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.031
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 36116603
AN - SCOPUS:85138576080
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 319
SP - 83
EP - 89
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -