Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns: an experimental investigation

Joel A. Howell, Peter M. McEvoy, Ben Grafton, Colin Macleod, Robert T. Kane, Rebecca A. Anderson, Sarah J. Egan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and objectives: Perfectionism is associated with the development and maintenance of several disorders. Given the importance of perfectionism understanding the biased information processes that underpin it is critical. The present study tested the hypothesis that heightened concern over mistakes subscale scores of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale are characterized by a tendency to impose emotionally negative interpretations on perfectionism-relevant situations. Method and design: Seventy-six non-clinical, general population participants’ were presented with interpretations of scenarios where a protagonist was described as achieving well above what was required, but fell short of their own high standard. Using a within-subjects, quasi-experimental design, we assessed interpretations of these scenarios by examining the degree to which participants rated test sentences as being likely implications of the original scenarios. Results: A generalized linear mixed model revealed higher concern over mistakes scores were associated with an increased tendency to rate negative target test sentences as being similar to the original perfectionism-relevant scenarios, and a reduced tendency to rate positive target test sentences as being similar to these original scenarios. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the cognitive–behavioral model of perfectionism. These findings support the inclusion of strategies in cognitive–behavioral treatment of perfectionism to reduce interpretation bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-269
Number of pages11
JournalAnxiety, Stress and Coping
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2019

Fingerprint

Perfectionism
Linear Models
Research Design
Maintenance
Scenarios
Population
Mistakes
Inclusion
Protagonist
Experimental Design

Cite this

Howell, Joel A. ; McEvoy, Peter M. ; Grafton, Ben ; Macleod, Colin ; Kane, Robert T. ; Anderson, Rebecca A. ; Egan, Sarah J. / Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns : an experimental investigation. In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 259-269.
@article{9809fb01f1a0451090a1c8af8faae375,
title = "Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns: an experimental investigation",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Perfectionism is associated with the development and maintenance of several disorders. Given the importance of perfectionism understanding the biased information processes that underpin it is critical. The present study tested the hypothesis that heightened concern over mistakes subscale scores of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale are characterized by a tendency to impose emotionally negative interpretations on perfectionism-relevant situations. Method and design: Seventy-six non-clinical, general population participants’ were presented with interpretations of scenarios where a protagonist was described as achieving well above what was required, but fell short of their own high standard. Using a within-subjects, quasi-experimental design, we assessed interpretations of these scenarios by examining the degree to which participants rated test sentences as being likely implications of the original scenarios. Results: A generalized linear mixed model revealed higher concern over mistakes scores were associated with an increased tendency to rate negative target test sentences as being similar to the original perfectionism-relevant scenarios, and a reduced tendency to rate positive target test sentences as being similar to these original scenarios. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the cognitive–behavioral model of perfectionism. These findings support the inclusion of strategies in cognitive–behavioral treatment of perfectionism to reduce interpretation bias.",
keywords = "cognitive bias, interpretation bias, Perfectionism, perfectionistic concerns",
author = "Howell, {Joel A.} and McEvoy, {Peter M.} and Ben Grafton and Colin Macleod and Kane, {Robert T.} and Anderson, {Rebecca A.} and Egan, {Sarah J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10615806.2019.1586888",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "259--269",
journal = "Anxiety, Stress, & Coping",
issn = "1061-5806",
publisher = "Brunner - Routledge (US)",
number = "3",

}

Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns : an experimental investigation. / Howell, Joel A.; McEvoy, Peter M.; Grafton, Ben; Macleod, Colin; Kane, Robert T.; Anderson, Rebecca A.; Egan, Sarah J.

In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping, Vol. 32, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 259-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns

T2 - an experimental investigation

AU - Howell, Joel A.

AU - McEvoy, Peter M.

AU - Grafton, Ben

AU - Macleod, Colin

AU - Kane, Robert T.

AU - Anderson, Rebecca A.

AU - Egan, Sarah J.

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - Background and objectives: Perfectionism is associated with the development and maintenance of several disorders. Given the importance of perfectionism understanding the biased information processes that underpin it is critical. The present study tested the hypothesis that heightened concern over mistakes subscale scores of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale are characterized by a tendency to impose emotionally negative interpretations on perfectionism-relevant situations. Method and design: Seventy-six non-clinical, general population participants’ were presented with interpretations of scenarios where a protagonist was described as achieving well above what was required, but fell short of their own high standard. Using a within-subjects, quasi-experimental design, we assessed interpretations of these scenarios by examining the degree to which participants rated test sentences as being likely implications of the original scenarios. Results: A generalized linear mixed model revealed higher concern over mistakes scores were associated with an increased tendency to rate negative target test sentences as being similar to the original perfectionism-relevant scenarios, and a reduced tendency to rate positive target test sentences as being similar to these original scenarios. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the cognitive–behavioral model of perfectionism. These findings support the inclusion of strategies in cognitive–behavioral treatment of perfectionism to reduce interpretation bias.

AB - Background and objectives: Perfectionism is associated with the development and maintenance of several disorders. Given the importance of perfectionism understanding the biased information processes that underpin it is critical. The present study tested the hypothesis that heightened concern over mistakes subscale scores of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale are characterized by a tendency to impose emotionally negative interpretations on perfectionism-relevant situations. Method and design: Seventy-six non-clinical, general population participants’ were presented with interpretations of scenarios where a protagonist was described as achieving well above what was required, but fell short of their own high standard. Using a within-subjects, quasi-experimental design, we assessed interpretations of these scenarios by examining the degree to which participants rated test sentences as being likely implications of the original scenarios. Results: A generalized linear mixed model revealed higher concern over mistakes scores were associated with an increased tendency to rate negative target test sentences as being similar to the original perfectionism-relevant scenarios, and a reduced tendency to rate positive target test sentences as being similar to these original scenarios. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the cognitive–behavioral model of perfectionism. These findings support the inclusion of strategies in cognitive–behavioral treatment of perfectionism to reduce interpretation bias.

KW - cognitive bias

KW - interpretation bias

KW - Perfectionism

KW - perfectionistic concerns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062789230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10615806.2019.1586888

DO - 10.1080/10615806.2019.1586888

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 259

EP - 269

JO - Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

JF - Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

SN - 1061-5806

IS - 3

ER -