Beyond factor analysis: Multidimensionality and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Revised

Maria E. Pushpanathan, Andrea M. Loftus, Natalie Gasson, Meghan G. Thomas, Caitlin F. Timms, Michelle Olaithe, Romola S. Bucks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many studies have sought to describe the relationship between sleep disturbance and cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD). The Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) and its variants (the Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale-Revised; PDSS-R, and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2; PDSS-2) quantify a range of symptoms impacting sleep in only 15 items. However, data from these scales may be problematic as included items have considerable conceptual breadth, and there may be overlap in the constructs assessed. Multidimensional measurement models, accounting for the tendency for items to measure multiple constructs, may be useful more accurately to model variance than traditional confirmatory factor analysis. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a multidimensional model (a bifactor model) is more appropriate than traditional factor analysis for data generated by these types of scales, using data collected using the PDSS-R as an exemplar. 166 participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD participated in this study. Using PDSS-R data, we compared three models: a unidimensional model; a 3-factor model consisting of sub-factors measuring insomnia, motor symptoms and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) symptoms; and, a confirmatory bifactor model with both a general factor and the same three sub-factors. Only the confirmatory bifactor model achieved satisfactory model fit, suggesting that PDSS-R data are multidimensional. There were differential associations between factor scores and patient characteristics, suggesting that some PDSS-R items, but not others, are influenced by mood and personality in addition to sleep symptoms. Multidimensional measurement models may also be a helpful tool in the PDSS and the PDSS-2 scales and may improve the sensitivity of these instruments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number0192394
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2018

Cite this

Pushpanathan, Maria E. ; Loftus, Andrea M. ; Gasson, Natalie ; Thomas, Meghan G. ; Timms, Caitlin F. ; Olaithe, Michelle ; Bucks, Romola S. / Beyond factor analysis : Multidimensionality and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Revised. In: PLoS One. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 2.
@article{ddf59ac95e8345b0a9e523aa269eeb31,
title = "Beyond factor analysis: Multidimensionality and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Revised",
abstract = "Many studies have sought to describe the relationship between sleep disturbance and cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD). The Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) and its variants (the Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale-Revised; PDSS-R, and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2; PDSS-2) quantify a range of symptoms impacting sleep in only 15 items. However, data from these scales may be problematic as included items have considerable conceptual breadth, and there may be overlap in the constructs assessed. Multidimensional measurement models, accounting for the tendency for items to measure multiple constructs, may be useful more accurately to model variance than traditional confirmatory factor analysis. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a multidimensional model (a bifactor model) is more appropriate than traditional factor analysis for data generated by these types of scales, using data collected using the PDSS-R as an exemplar. 166 participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD participated in this study. Using PDSS-R data, we compared three models: a unidimensional model; a 3-factor model consisting of sub-factors measuring insomnia, motor symptoms and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) symptoms; and, a confirmatory bifactor model with both a general factor and the same three sub-factors. Only the confirmatory bifactor model achieved satisfactory model fit, suggesting that PDSS-R data are multidimensional. There were differential associations between factor scores and patient characteristics, suggesting that some PDSS-R items, but not others, are influenced by mood and personality in addition to sleep symptoms. Multidimensional measurement models may also be a helpful tool in the PDSS and the PDSS-2 scales and may improve the sensitivity of these instruments.",
keywords = "NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS, GENDER-DIFFERENCES, BEHAVIOR DISORDER, PERSONALITY, INSOMNIA, VERSION, COMMON, LIFE, AGE, PD",
author = "Pushpanathan, {Maria E.} and Loftus, {Andrea M.} and Natalie Gasson and Thomas, {Meghan G.} and Timms, {Caitlin F.} and Michelle Olaithe and Bucks, {Romola S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0192394",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "P L o S One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
number = "2",

}

Beyond factor analysis : Multidimensionality and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Revised. / Pushpanathan, Maria E.; Loftus, Andrea M.; Gasson, Natalie; Thomas, Meghan G.; Timms, Caitlin F.; Olaithe, Michelle; Bucks, Romola S.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 2, 0192394, 12.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond factor analysis

T2 - Multidimensionality and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Revised

AU - Pushpanathan, Maria E.

AU - Loftus, Andrea M.

AU - Gasson, Natalie

AU - Thomas, Meghan G.

AU - Timms, Caitlin F.

AU - Olaithe, Michelle

AU - Bucks, Romola S.

PY - 2018/2/12

Y1 - 2018/2/12

N2 - Many studies have sought to describe the relationship between sleep disturbance and cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD). The Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) and its variants (the Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale-Revised; PDSS-R, and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2; PDSS-2) quantify a range of symptoms impacting sleep in only 15 items. However, data from these scales may be problematic as included items have considerable conceptual breadth, and there may be overlap in the constructs assessed. Multidimensional measurement models, accounting for the tendency for items to measure multiple constructs, may be useful more accurately to model variance than traditional confirmatory factor analysis. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a multidimensional model (a bifactor model) is more appropriate than traditional factor analysis for data generated by these types of scales, using data collected using the PDSS-R as an exemplar. 166 participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD participated in this study. Using PDSS-R data, we compared three models: a unidimensional model; a 3-factor model consisting of sub-factors measuring insomnia, motor symptoms and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) symptoms; and, a confirmatory bifactor model with both a general factor and the same three sub-factors. Only the confirmatory bifactor model achieved satisfactory model fit, suggesting that PDSS-R data are multidimensional. There were differential associations between factor scores and patient characteristics, suggesting that some PDSS-R items, but not others, are influenced by mood and personality in addition to sleep symptoms. Multidimensional measurement models may also be a helpful tool in the PDSS and the PDSS-2 scales and may improve the sensitivity of these instruments.

AB - Many studies have sought to describe the relationship between sleep disturbance and cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD). The Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) and its variants (the Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale-Revised; PDSS-R, and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2; PDSS-2) quantify a range of symptoms impacting sleep in only 15 items. However, data from these scales may be problematic as included items have considerable conceptual breadth, and there may be overlap in the constructs assessed. Multidimensional measurement models, accounting for the tendency for items to measure multiple constructs, may be useful more accurately to model variance than traditional confirmatory factor analysis. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a multidimensional model (a bifactor model) is more appropriate than traditional factor analysis for data generated by these types of scales, using data collected using the PDSS-R as an exemplar. 166 participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD participated in this study. Using PDSS-R data, we compared three models: a unidimensional model; a 3-factor model consisting of sub-factors measuring insomnia, motor symptoms and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) symptoms; and, a confirmatory bifactor model with both a general factor and the same three sub-factors. Only the confirmatory bifactor model achieved satisfactory model fit, suggesting that PDSS-R data are multidimensional. There were differential associations between factor scores and patient characteristics, suggesting that some PDSS-R items, but not others, are influenced by mood and personality in addition to sleep symptoms. Multidimensional measurement models may also be a helpful tool in the PDSS and the PDSS-2 scales and may improve the sensitivity of these instruments.

KW - NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS

KW - GENDER-DIFFERENCES

KW - BEHAVIOR DISORDER

KW - PERSONALITY

KW - INSOMNIA

KW - VERSION

KW - COMMON

KW - LIFE

KW - AGE

KW - PD

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0192394

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0192394

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - P L o S One

JF - P L o S One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - 0192394

ER -