Back to the unchanging past

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addition of a second temporal dimension does not provide a model of changing the past and, second, that neither does the addition of n temporal dimensions for any n > 1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-147
Number of pages19
JournalPacific Philosophical Quarterly
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Attack
Time Traveller
Time Travel

Cite this

@article{aeb744b1595d4419a63a273a4ab39134,
title = "Back to the unchanging past",
abstract = "The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addition of a second temporal dimension does not provide a model of changing the past and, second, that neither does the addition of n temporal dimensions for any n > 1.",
author = "Samuel Baron",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/papq.12127",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "129--147",
journal = "Pacific Philosophical Quarterly",
issn = "0279-0750",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Back to the unchanging past. / Baron, Samuel.

In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 98, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 129-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Back to the unchanging past

AU - Baron, Samuel

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addition of a second temporal dimension does not provide a model of changing the past and, second, that neither does the addition of n temporal dimensions for any n > 1.

AB - The standard philosophical view of time travel has it that time travelers cannot change the past. It has been argued by some that the standard view is false, and that this can be shown using a two-dimensional model of time. I defend the standard view against this attack. I show, first, that the addition of a second temporal dimension does not provide a model of changing the past and, second, that neither does the addition of n temporal dimensions for any n > 1.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948845142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/papq.12127

DO - 10.1111/papq.12127

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 129

EP - 147

JO - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

JF - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

SN - 0279-0750

IS - 1

ER -