Axial impact behavior and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement

Thong M. Pham, Mohamed Elchalakani, Ali Karrech, Hong Hao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the axial impact resistance and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement. The impact tests were carried out using an instrumented drop-weight testing apparatus. The experimental results have shown that rubberized concrete significantly reduced the maximum impact force of up to 50% and extended the impact duration. These characteristics make rubberized concrete a promising material for protective structures and particularly for future sustainable construction of rigid roadside barriers. Glass fiber–reinforced polymer confinement is a very effective method to improve the impact resistance for both conventional concrete and particularly for rubberized concrete. It was found that the rubberized concrete reduced the maximum impact force so that it transferred a lower force to a protected structure as well as a lower rebound force, which is desirable for protection of passengers in an incident of vehicle collision. Interestingly, the rubberized concrete showed a lower energy absorption capacity as compared to conventional concrete, where the exact reason for this is unknown to the authors. Therefore, further research is sought to provide more understanding of the response of rubberized concrete under impact and improve its energy absorption. This study explored experimentally the use of rubberized concrete as a promising sustainable construction material for applications to construction of columns in buildings located in seismic active zones or subjected to terrorist attack, security bollards and rigid road side barriers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-173
JournalInternational Journal of Protective Structures
Volume10
Issue number2
Early online date20 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Energy absorption
Concretes
Fibers
Polymers
Impact resistance
Roadsides
Glass

Cite this

@article{290f0678317c4067aac696c834858a23,
title = "Axial impact behavior and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement",
abstract = "This study investigates the axial impact resistance and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement. The impact tests were carried out using an instrumented drop-weight testing apparatus. The experimental results have shown that rubberized concrete significantly reduced the maximum impact force of up to 50{\%} and extended the impact duration. These characteristics make rubberized concrete a promising material for protective structures and particularly for future sustainable construction of rigid roadside barriers. Glass fiber–reinforced polymer confinement is a very effective method to improve the impact resistance for both conventional concrete and particularly for rubberized concrete. It was found that the rubberized concrete reduced the maximum impact force so that it transferred a lower force to a protected structure as well as a lower rebound force, which is desirable for protection of passengers in an incident of vehicle collision. Interestingly, the rubberized concrete showed a lower energy absorption capacity as compared to conventional concrete, where the exact reason for this is unknown to the authors. Therefore, further research is sought to provide more understanding of the response of rubberized concrete under impact and improve its energy absorption. This study explored experimentally the use of rubberized concrete as a promising sustainable construction material for applications to construction of columns in buildings located in seismic active zones or subjected to terrorist attack, security bollards and rigid road side barriers.",
keywords = "drop-weight test, fiber-reinforced polymer, high loading rate, impact loading, Rubberized concrete",
author = "Pham, {Thong M.} and Mohamed Elchalakani and Ali Karrech and Hong Hao",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/2041419618800771",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "154--173",
journal = "International Journal of Protective Structures",
issn = "2041-4196",
publisher = "Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Axial impact behavior and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement

AU - Pham, Thong M.

AU - Elchalakani, Mohamed

AU - Karrech, Ali

AU - Hao, Hong

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - This study investigates the axial impact resistance and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement. The impact tests were carried out using an instrumented drop-weight testing apparatus. The experimental results have shown that rubberized concrete significantly reduced the maximum impact force of up to 50% and extended the impact duration. These characteristics make rubberized concrete a promising material for protective structures and particularly for future sustainable construction of rigid roadside barriers. Glass fiber–reinforced polymer confinement is a very effective method to improve the impact resistance for both conventional concrete and particularly for rubberized concrete. It was found that the rubberized concrete reduced the maximum impact force so that it transferred a lower force to a protected structure as well as a lower rebound force, which is desirable for protection of passengers in an incident of vehicle collision. Interestingly, the rubberized concrete showed a lower energy absorption capacity as compared to conventional concrete, where the exact reason for this is unknown to the authors. Therefore, further research is sought to provide more understanding of the response of rubberized concrete under impact and improve its energy absorption. This study explored experimentally the use of rubberized concrete as a promising sustainable construction material for applications to construction of columns in buildings located in seismic active zones or subjected to terrorist attack, security bollards and rigid road side barriers.

AB - This study investigates the axial impact resistance and energy absorption of rubberized concrete with/without fiber-reinforced polymer confinement. The impact tests were carried out using an instrumented drop-weight testing apparatus. The experimental results have shown that rubberized concrete significantly reduced the maximum impact force of up to 50% and extended the impact duration. These characteristics make rubberized concrete a promising material for protective structures and particularly for future sustainable construction of rigid roadside barriers. Glass fiber–reinforced polymer confinement is a very effective method to improve the impact resistance for both conventional concrete and particularly for rubberized concrete. It was found that the rubberized concrete reduced the maximum impact force so that it transferred a lower force to a protected structure as well as a lower rebound force, which is desirable for protection of passengers in an incident of vehicle collision. Interestingly, the rubberized concrete showed a lower energy absorption capacity as compared to conventional concrete, where the exact reason for this is unknown to the authors. Therefore, further research is sought to provide more understanding of the response of rubberized concrete under impact and improve its energy absorption. This study explored experimentally the use of rubberized concrete as a promising sustainable construction material for applications to construction of columns in buildings located in seismic active zones or subjected to terrorist attack, security bollards and rigid road side barriers.

KW - drop-weight test

KW - fiber-reinforced polymer

KW - high loading rate

KW - impact loading

KW - Rubberized concrete

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058850377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2041419618800771

DO - 10.1177/2041419618800771

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 154

EP - 173

JO - International Journal of Protective Structures

JF - International Journal of Protective Structures

SN - 2041-4196

IS - 2

ER -