Australian initial public offerings and US venture capital: different stuctures for similar early-stage funding?

Terry Marsh, Kylie Gilbey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) initial public offerings (IPOs) are an important source of early-stage capital and have also driven a substantial increase in main-board listed companies post-millennium. By contrast, Australian venture capital (VC) funding has remained largely dormant. The opposite has occurred in the US: IPOs have fallen by half, and VC funding has surged. The authors examine the reason for this divergence between ASX IPO and US VC systems that, with their supporting ecosystems, have many features in common and function similarly. The authors explore the potential factors that could explain the US VC surge vis-à-vis Australia's VC stagnation. he ASX's structure and ecosystem have been critical to its success in fostering early-stage main-board listings. While the US has succeeded in alternatively growing VC, there is an increasing concern that the latter has occurred partially because valuations are stretched, tax concessions for carried-interest capital gains are too high and corporate control benefits are becoming increasingly diluted. These developments could have important implications for Australia, where VC structures are currently being reviewed.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no prior study has attempted to bridge the broad differences in IPO and VC funding trends for early-stage companies in Australia and the USA.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Accounting Literature
Early online date1 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Australian initial public offerings and US venture capital: different stuctures for similar early-stage funding?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this