Attentional bias modification and pain: The role of sensory and affective stimuli

Jemma Todd, Louise Sharpe, Ben Colagiuri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is growing evidence to support attentional bias modification (ABM) techniques such as the modified dot-probe task within the pain literature. Such techniques can help to inform theoretical models of pain by identifying the causal role of attentional bias constructs. The aim of this research was to explore the effects of dot-probe ABM that trains individuals towards (+) or away from (-) sensory (S) and affective (A) pain words, on attentional biases, interpretation biases, and pain outcomes. Healthy undergraduate students (N = 106) completed questionnaires, an attentional bias dot-probe task, and an interpretation bias task before and after ABM, one of four ABM versions that differed in training direction (S+A+, S-A+, S+A-, S-A-), and pain outcomes using the cold pressor task. Those trained towards affective pain words were found to have a greater pain threshold but also greater distress at tolerance. However, mechanisms of change could not be established, as ABM did not affect attentional or interpretation bias, even though changes in attentional bias were associated with pain outcomes. These findings provide partial support for the threat interpretation model and highlight the utility of affective pain ABM, although further investigation of causal mechanisms is warranted. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-61
Number of pages9
JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
Volume83
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain
Attentional Bias
Pain Threshold
Theoretical Models
Students
Research

Cite this

@article{7b29a4364c5f4184818f24be1cbb2f96,
title = "Attentional bias modification and pain: The role of sensory and affective stimuli",
abstract = "There is growing evidence to support attentional bias modification (ABM) techniques such as the modified dot-probe task within the pain literature. Such techniques can help to inform theoretical models of pain by identifying the causal role of attentional bias constructs. The aim of this research was to explore the effects of dot-probe ABM that trains individuals towards (+) or away from (-) sensory (S) and affective (A) pain words, on attentional biases, interpretation biases, and pain outcomes. Healthy undergraduate students (N = 106) completed questionnaires, an attentional bias dot-probe task, and an interpretation bias task before and after ABM, one of four ABM versions that differed in training direction (S+A+, S-A+, S+A-, S-A-), and pain outcomes using the cold pressor task. Those trained towards affective pain words were found to have a greater pain threshold but also greater distress at tolerance. However, mechanisms of change could not be established, as ABM did not affect attentional or interpretation bias, even though changes in attentional bias were associated with pain outcomes. These findings provide partial support for the threat interpretation model and highlight the utility of affective pain ABM, although further investigation of causal mechanisms is warranted. {\circledC} 2016 Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "Jemma Todd and Louise Sharpe and Ben Colagiuri",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "53--61",
journal = "Behaviour Research & Thearpy",
issn = "0005-7967",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Attentional bias modification and pain: The role of sensory and affective stimuli. / Todd, Jemma; Sharpe, Louise; Colagiuri, Ben.

In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 83, 2016, p. 53-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attentional bias modification and pain: The role of sensory and affective stimuli

AU - Todd, Jemma

AU - Sharpe, Louise

AU - Colagiuri, Ben

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - There is growing evidence to support attentional bias modification (ABM) techniques such as the modified dot-probe task within the pain literature. Such techniques can help to inform theoretical models of pain by identifying the causal role of attentional bias constructs. The aim of this research was to explore the effects of dot-probe ABM that trains individuals towards (+) or away from (-) sensory (S) and affective (A) pain words, on attentional biases, interpretation biases, and pain outcomes. Healthy undergraduate students (N = 106) completed questionnaires, an attentional bias dot-probe task, and an interpretation bias task before and after ABM, one of four ABM versions that differed in training direction (S+A+, S-A+, S+A-, S-A-), and pain outcomes using the cold pressor task. Those trained towards affective pain words were found to have a greater pain threshold but also greater distress at tolerance. However, mechanisms of change could not be established, as ABM did not affect attentional or interpretation bias, even though changes in attentional bias were associated with pain outcomes. These findings provide partial support for the threat interpretation model and highlight the utility of affective pain ABM, although further investigation of causal mechanisms is warranted. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - There is growing evidence to support attentional bias modification (ABM) techniques such as the modified dot-probe task within the pain literature. Such techniques can help to inform theoretical models of pain by identifying the causal role of attentional bias constructs. The aim of this research was to explore the effects of dot-probe ABM that trains individuals towards (+) or away from (-) sensory (S) and affective (A) pain words, on attentional biases, interpretation biases, and pain outcomes. Healthy undergraduate students (N = 106) completed questionnaires, an attentional bias dot-probe task, and an interpretation bias task before and after ABM, one of four ABM versions that differed in training direction (S+A+, S-A+, S+A-, S-A-), and pain outcomes using the cold pressor task. Those trained towards affective pain words were found to have a greater pain threshold but also greater distress at tolerance. However, mechanisms of change could not be established, as ABM did not affect attentional or interpretation bias, even though changes in attentional bias were associated with pain outcomes. These findings provide partial support for the threat interpretation model and highlight the utility of affective pain ABM, although further investigation of causal mechanisms is warranted. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 53

EP - 61

JO - Behaviour Research & Thearpy

JF - Behaviour Research & Thearpy

SN - 0005-7967

ER -