“Attention: Myth Follows!” Facilitated Communication, Parent and Professional Attitudes towards Evidence-based Practice, and the Power of Misinformation

D. Trembath, J. Paynter, D. Keen, Ullrich Ecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 Taylor & Francis. Facilitated Communication (FC) is a non-evidence-based intervention with documented dangers that continues to be used with some children with autism spectrum disorders. In this response to Lilienfeld, Marshall, Todd, and Shane, we consider how the findings of our own research involving parents and professionals may contribute to the development of strategies aimed at countering FC and other unsupported practices. We also consider the ways in which misinformation may be contributing to the persistence of FC. We affirm Lilienfeld et al.’s recommendation that countering FC requires a comprehensive and concerted effort, which must build awareness, capacity, and resilience within parents, professionals, and organizations to adopt only evidence-based interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-126
JournalEvidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
myth
parents
Communication
communication
evidence
Parents
autism
resilience
persistence
Power (Psychology)
Research

Cite this

@article{40d7a7f63f914d289c28052de2b99407,
title = "“Attention: Myth Follows!” Facilitated Communication, Parent and Professional Attitudes towards Evidence-based Practice, and the Power of Misinformation",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 Taylor & Francis. Facilitated Communication (FC) is a non-evidence-based intervention with documented dangers that continues to be used with some children with autism spectrum disorders. In this response to Lilienfeld, Marshall, Todd, and Shane, we consider how the findings of our own research involving parents and professionals may contribute to the development of strategies aimed at countering FC and other unsupported practices. We also consider the ways in which misinformation may be contributing to the persistence of FC. We affirm Lilienfeld et al.’s recommendation that countering FC requires a comprehensive and concerted effort, which must build awareness, capacity, and resilience within parents, professionals, and organizations to adopt only evidence-based interventions.",
author = "D. Trembath and J. Paynter and D. Keen and Ullrich Ecker",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/17489539.2015.1103433",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "113--126",
journal = "Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention",
issn = "1748-9539",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Attention: Myth Follows!” Facilitated Communication, Parent and Professional Attitudes towards Evidence-based Practice, and the Power of Misinformation

AU - Trembath, D.

AU - Paynter, J.

AU - Keen, D.

AU - Ecker, Ullrich

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - © 2016 Taylor & Francis. Facilitated Communication (FC) is a non-evidence-based intervention with documented dangers that continues to be used with some children with autism spectrum disorders. In this response to Lilienfeld, Marshall, Todd, and Shane, we consider how the findings of our own research involving parents and professionals may contribute to the development of strategies aimed at countering FC and other unsupported practices. We also consider the ways in which misinformation may be contributing to the persistence of FC. We affirm Lilienfeld et al.’s recommendation that countering FC requires a comprehensive and concerted effort, which must build awareness, capacity, and resilience within parents, professionals, and organizations to adopt only evidence-based interventions.

AB - © 2016 Taylor & Francis. Facilitated Communication (FC) is a non-evidence-based intervention with documented dangers that continues to be used with some children with autism spectrum disorders. In this response to Lilienfeld, Marshall, Todd, and Shane, we consider how the findings of our own research involving parents and professionals may contribute to the development of strategies aimed at countering FC and other unsupported practices. We also consider the ways in which misinformation may be contributing to the persistence of FC. We affirm Lilienfeld et al.’s recommendation that countering FC requires a comprehensive and concerted effort, which must build awareness, capacity, and resilience within parents, professionals, and organizations to adopt only evidence-based interventions.

U2 - 10.1080/17489539.2015.1103433

DO - 10.1080/17489539.2015.1103433

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 113

EP - 126

JO - Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

JF - Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

SN - 1748-9539

IS - 3

ER -