TY - JOUR
T1 - Attention capture by own name decreases with speech compression
AU - Li, Simon Y.W.
AU - Lee, Alan L.F.
AU - Chiu, Jenny W.S.
AU - Loeb, Robert G.
AU - Sanderson, Penelope M.
PY - 2024/5/12
Y1 - 2024/5/12
N2 - Auditory stimuli that are relevant to a listener have the potential to capture focal attention even when unattended, the listener’s own name being a particularly effective stimulus. We report two experiments to test the attention-capturing potential of the listener’s own name in normal speech and time-compressed speech. In Experiment 1, 39 participants were tested with a visual word categorization task with uncompressed spoken names as background auditory distractors. Participants’ word categorization performance was slower when hearing their own name rather than other names, and in a final test, they were faster at detecting their own name than other names. Experiment 2 used the same task paradigm, but the auditory distractors were time-compressed names. Three compression levels were tested with 25 participants in each condition. Participants’ word categorization performance was again slower when hearing their own name than when hearing other names; the slowing was strongest with slight compression and weakest with intense compression. Personally relevant time-compressed speech has the potential to capture attention, but the degree of capture depends on the level of compression. Attention capture by time-compressed speech has practical significance and provides partial evidence for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
AB - Auditory stimuli that are relevant to a listener have the potential to capture focal attention even when unattended, the listener’s own name being a particularly effective stimulus. We report two experiments to test the attention-capturing potential of the listener’s own name in normal speech and time-compressed speech. In Experiment 1, 39 participants were tested with a visual word categorization task with uncompressed spoken names as background auditory distractors. Participants’ word categorization performance was slower when hearing their own name rather than other names, and in a final test, they were faster at detecting their own name than other names. Experiment 2 used the same task paradigm, but the auditory distractors were time-compressed names. Three compression levels were tested with 25 participants in each condition. Participants’ word categorization performance was again slower when hearing their own name than when hearing other names; the slowing was strongest with slight compression and weakest with intense compression. Personally relevant time-compressed speech has the potential to capture attention, but the degree of capture depends on the level of compression. Attention capture by time-compressed speech has practical significance and provides partial evidence for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
KW - Attention capture
KW - Cocktail party effect
KW - Time-compressed speech
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192951643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s41235-024-00555-9
DO - 10.1186/s41235-024-00555-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 38735013
AN - SCOPUS:85192951643
SN - 2365-7464
VL - 9
JO - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
JF - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
M1 - 29
ER -