TY - JOUR
T1 - Atraumatic restorative treatments improve child oral health-related quality of life
T2 - A noninferiority randomized controlled trial
AU - Arrow, Peter
AU - Forrest, Helen
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Objectives: Management of dental caries under dental general anaesthesia (DGA) in young children improves their quality of life. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to test the changes in oral health-related quality of life among children treated under a DGA or managed using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall crown approaches (ARTs). Methods: Children scheduled for a DGA for the management of dental caries after assessment at the Oral Health Centre of Western Australia were invited to participate. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Child oral health-related quality of life (COHRQoL) was evaluated through the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and the child-specific Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children (CARIES-QC) at baseline and 12 months after consent. The changes in child oral health-related quality of life were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon's matched-pairs rank test were used for within-group comparison and t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and test of proportions for between-group comparisons. Linear regression was used for multivariable analyses of the follow-up scores. Results: Sixty-five parents/carers agreed to participate and were randomized (Test = 32; Control = 33). Mean age = 4.7 years, SD 1.1; 51% male. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences in age and sex between the groups; however, the ARTs group reported higher ECOHIS scores. At follow-up, both the ARTs and DGA groups had lower ECOHIS scores (20.7 vs 12.9 and 14.4 vs 13.3, respectively) and CARIES-QC scores (12.6 vs 7.1 and 9.9 vs 8.4, respectively). The within-group differences in the ARTs group were statistically significant while the differences in the DGA group were not, P <.01 and P >.05, respectively. In a linear regression of the follow-up scores, being in the DGA group increased the follow-up scores, but it was no longer statistically significant while baseline impact scores were significantly associated with greater follow-up scores for both the ECOHIS and the CARIES-QC, P <.01. Conclusion: The child oral health-related quality life among children scheduled for dental general anaesthesia improved after receiving minimally invasive, atraumatic restorative treatments of dental caries.
AB - Objectives: Management of dental caries under dental general anaesthesia (DGA) in young children improves their quality of life. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to test the changes in oral health-related quality of life among children treated under a DGA or managed using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall crown approaches (ARTs). Methods: Children scheduled for a DGA for the management of dental caries after assessment at the Oral Health Centre of Western Australia were invited to participate. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Child oral health-related quality of life (COHRQoL) was evaluated through the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and the child-specific Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children (CARIES-QC) at baseline and 12 months after consent. The changes in child oral health-related quality of life were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon's matched-pairs rank test were used for within-group comparison and t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and test of proportions for between-group comparisons. Linear regression was used for multivariable analyses of the follow-up scores. Results: Sixty-five parents/carers agreed to participate and were randomized (Test = 32; Control = 33). Mean age = 4.7 years, SD 1.1; 51% male. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences in age and sex between the groups; however, the ARTs group reported higher ECOHIS scores. At follow-up, both the ARTs and DGA groups had lower ECOHIS scores (20.7 vs 12.9 and 14.4 vs 13.3, respectively) and CARIES-QC scores (12.6 vs 7.1 and 9.9 vs 8.4, respectively). The within-group differences in the ARTs group were statistically significant while the differences in the DGA group were not, P <.01 and P >.05, respectively. In a linear regression of the follow-up scores, being in the DGA group increased the follow-up scores, but it was no longer statistically significant while baseline impact scores were significantly associated with greater follow-up scores for both the ECOHIS and the CARIES-QC, P <.01. Conclusion: The child oral health-related quality life among children scheduled for dental general anaesthesia improved after receiving minimally invasive, atraumatic restorative treatments of dental caries.
KW - child oral health-related quality of life
KW - early childhood caries
KW - Hall technique
KW - minimally invasive dentistry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084859641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cdoe.12539
DO - 10.1111/cdoe.12539
M3 - Article
C2 - 32424833
AN - SCOPUS:85084859641
SN - 0301-5661
VL - 48
SP - 349
EP - 356
JO - Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
JF - Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
IS - 4
ER -