Association between treatment planning and delivery factors and disease progression in prostate cancer radiotherapy: Results from the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial

Marco Marcello, Martin Ebert, Annette Haworth, Allison Steigler, Angel Kennedy, David Joseph, James Denham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: To evaluate the impact of treatment planning and delivery factors on treatment outcome as measured by post-treatment disease progression. Materials and methods: Accruing 813 external beam radiotherapy participants during 2003–2007, the RADAR trial collected a comprehensive range of clinical treatment factor data for each participant. Both the Fine and Gray competing risks modelling and the Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis were undertaken to determine the impact of these factors on local-composite progression (LCP), with 709 participants available for analysis. Results: Participants with treatments involving 7 or more beams experienced significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio (relative to 3-beam participants) of 3.056 (CI: 1.446–6.458, p < 0.0034). Participants treated with a more rigorous dose calculation algorithm also displayed significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio of 1.686 (CI: 1.334–2.132, p < 0.0001). The KM analysis resulted in the same groups showing a higher incidence of LCP, with log-rank test results of p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008 respectively. Conclusions: The RADAR dataset has enabled a successful secondary analysis in which the impact of technical modifications has been assessed, challenging several established hypotheses. Increasingly precise treatments should be complemented with increasing accuracy to avoid potential geometric miss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-256
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Disease Progression
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Incidence
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{0398aa5031294d6a960c2fc8b979a962,
title = "Association between treatment planning and delivery factors and disease progression in prostate cancer radiotherapy: Results from the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial",
abstract = "Background and purpose: To evaluate the impact of treatment planning and delivery factors on treatment outcome as measured by post-treatment disease progression. Materials and methods: Accruing 813 external beam radiotherapy participants during 2003–2007, the RADAR trial collected a comprehensive range of clinical treatment factor data for each participant. Both the Fine and Gray competing risks modelling and the Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis were undertaken to determine the impact of these factors on local-composite progression (LCP), with 709 participants available for analysis. Results: Participants with treatments involving 7 or more beams experienced significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio (relative to 3-beam participants) of 3.056 (CI: 1.446–6.458, p < 0.0034). Participants treated with a more rigorous dose calculation algorithm also displayed significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio of 1.686 (CI: 1.334–2.132, p < 0.0001). The KM analysis resulted in the same groups showing a higher incidence of LCP, with log-rank test results of p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008 respectively. Conclusions: The RADAR dataset has enabled a successful secondary analysis in which the impact of technical modifications has been assessed, challenging several established hypotheses. Increasingly precise treatments should be complemented with increasing accuracy to avoid potential geometric miss.",
keywords = "Progression, Prostate, Radiotherapy, Treatment factors",
author = "Marco Marcello and Martin Ebert and Annette Haworth and Allison Steigler and Angel Kennedy and David Joseph and James Denham",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.021",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "249--256",
journal = "Radiotherapy & Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Association between treatment planning and delivery factors and disease progression in prostate cancer radiotherapy : Results from the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial. / Marcello, Marco; Ebert, Martin; Haworth, Annette; Steigler, Allison; Kennedy, Angel; Joseph, David; Denham, James.

In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 126, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 249-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between treatment planning and delivery factors and disease progression in prostate cancer radiotherapy

T2 - Results from the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial

AU - Marcello, Marco

AU - Ebert, Martin

AU - Haworth, Annette

AU - Steigler, Allison

AU - Kennedy, Angel

AU - Joseph, David

AU - Denham, James

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background and purpose: To evaluate the impact of treatment planning and delivery factors on treatment outcome as measured by post-treatment disease progression. Materials and methods: Accruing 813 external beam radiotherapy participants during 2003–2007, the RADAR trial collected a comprehensive range of clinical treatment factor data for each participant. Both the Fine and Gray competing risks modelling and the Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis were undertaken to determine the impact of these factors on local-composite progression (LCP), with 709 participants available for analysis. Results: Participants with treatments involving 7 or more beams experienced significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio (relative to 3-beam participants) of 3.056 (CI: 1.446–6.458, p < 0.0034). Participants treated with a more rigorous dose calculation algorithm also displayed significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio of 1.686 (CI: 1.334–2.132, p < 0.0001). The KM analysis resulted in the same groups showing a higher incidence of LCP, with log-rank test results of p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008 respectively. Conclusions: The RADAR dataset has enabled a successful secondary analysis in which the impact of technical modifications has been assessed, challenging several established hypotheses. Increasingly precise treatments should be complemented with increasing accuracy to avoid potential geometric miss.

AB - Background and purpose: To evaluate the impact of treatment planning and delivery factors on treatment outcome as measured by post-treatment disease progression. Materials and methods: Accruing 813 external beam radiotherapy participants during 2003–2007, the RADAR trial collected a comprehensive range of clinical treatment factor data for each participant. Both the Fine and Gray competing risks modelling and the Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis were undertaken to determine the impact of these factors on local-composite progression (LCP), with 709 participants available for analysis. Results: Participants with treatments involving 7 or more beams experienced significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio (relative to 3-beam participants) of 3.056 (CI: 1.446–6.458, p < 0.0034). Participants treated with a more rigorous dose calculation algorithm also displayed significantly higher incidence of LCP, with a sub-hazard ratio of 1.686 (CI: 1.334–2.132, p < 0.0001). The KM analysis resulted in the same groups showing a higher incidence of LCP, with log-rank test results of p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008 respectively. Conclusions: The RADAR dataset has enabled a successful secondary analysis in which the impact of technical modifications has been assessed, challenging several established hypotheses. Increasingly precise treatments should be complemented with increasing accuracy to avoid potential geometric miss.

KW - Progression

KW - Prostate

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Treatment factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033214709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.021

M3 - Article

VL - 126

SP - 249

EP - 256

JO - Radiotherapy & Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy & Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 2

ER -