Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery

Laura L. Kuhar, Karl Bunney, Michael Jackson, Peter Austin, Jian Li, David J. Robinson, Henning Prommer, Jing Sun, Jess Oram, Asha Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory studies to characterise mineralogy and hydrometallurgical behaviour can be used as an essential and critical sub-component of field leach trials to reduce the risk associated with the implementation of an in-situ recovery process. Sample characterisation, bottle-roll leach tests, column leach tests and ion-exchange studies were conducted on samples from the sandstone-hosted Bennet Well deposit (Yanrey Station) in Western Australia, to obtain an understanding of the ore properties, leach behaviour and lixiviant/oxidant options, uranium recoveries and impurity treatment with a view to determining the suitability of this deposit for in-situ recovery processing. Drill core samples from the deposit contained coffinite, were suspected to contain autunite, and contained uranium associated with coal particles and titanium oxides. The main gangue mineral was quartz, and moderate quantities of K-feldspar, kaolinite and muscovite were present. Bottle-roll and column leach tests indicated that sulfuric acid or a carbonate/bicarbonate lixiviant would be suitable for leaching, with the former yielding a higher maximum uranium extraction. Acid column tests on five drill core samples from different deposit locations yielded between 57% and 84% uranium extraction, and 32% to 69% uranium extraction was achieved for the carbonate column leach tests, without oxidant addition. Oxidant addition increased the uranium extraction to 93%–98% for the acid column leach tests and 38%–70% for the carbonate column leach tests, however, oxidant addition complicates downstream processing. Column leach tests yielded lower recoveries compared with the bottle-roll leach tests and recoveries are expected to be lower for a field-scale implementation. A number of ion-exchange resins were found to be suitable for uranium recovery, with up to 100% loading and elution achieved in the acid and carbonate systems. This approach provides an experimental guideline for similar application to deposits that may be amenable to ISR processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-166
Number of pages10
JournalHydrometallurgy
Volume179
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Uranium deposits
Uranium
Sandstone
Recovery
Carbonates
Oxidants
Bottles
Core samples
Acids
Processing
Ion Exchange Resins
Kaolin
Feldspar
Quartz
Ion exchange resins
Mineralogy
Coal
Kaolinite
Titanium oxides
Bicarbonates

Cite this

Kuhar, L. L., Bunney, K., Jackson, M., Austin, P., Li, J., Robinson, D. J., ... Rao, A. (2018). Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery. Hydrometallurgy, 179, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.003
Kuhar, Laura L. ; Bunney, Karl ; Jackson, Michael ; Austin, Peter ; Li, Jian ; Robinson, David J. ; Prommer, Henning ; Sun, Jing ; Oram, Jess ; Rao, Asha. / Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery. In: Hydrometallurgy. 2018 ; Vol. 179. pp. 157-166.
@article{0042fa2598ff42048f5a39391e614da3,
title = "Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery",
abstract = "Laboratory studies to characterise mineralogy and hydrometallurgical behaviour can be used as an essential and critical sub-component of field leach trials to reduce the risk associated with the implementation of an in-situ recovery process. Sample characterisation, bottle-roll leach tests, column leach tests and ion-exchange studies were conducted on samples from the sandstone-hosted Bennet Well deposit (Yanrey Station) in Western Australia, to obtain an understanding of the ore properties, leach behaviour and lixiviant/oxidant options, uranium recoveries and impurity treatment with a view to determining the suitability of this deposit for in-situ recovery processing. Drill core samples from the deposit contained coffinite, were suspected to contain autunite, and contained uranium associated with coal particles and titanium oxides. The main gangue mineral was quartz, and moderate quantities of K-feldspar, kaolinite and muscovite were present. Bottle-roll and column leach tests indicated that sulfuric acid or a carbonate/bicarbonate lixiviant would be suitable for leaching, with the former yielding a higher maximum uranium extraction. Acid column tests on five drill core samples from different deposit locations yielded between 57{\%} and 84{\%} uranium extraction, and 32{\%} to 69{\%} uranium extraction was achieved for the carbonate column leach tests, without oxidant addition. Oxidant addition increased the uranium extraction to 93{\%}–98{\%} for the acid column leach tests and 38{\%}–70{\%} for the carbonate column leach tests, however, oxidant addition complicates downstream processing. Column leach tests yielded lower recoveries compared with the bottle-roll leach tests and recoveries are expected to be lower for a field-scale implementation. A number of ion-exchange resins were found to be suitable for uranium recovery, with up to 100{\%} loading and elution achieved in the acid and carbonate systems. This approach provides an experimental guideline for similar application to deposits that may be amenable to ISR processing.",
keywords = "Characterisation, In-situ recovery, Ion exchange, Leaching, Uranium",
author = "Kuhar, {Laura L.} and Karl Bunney and Michael Jackson and Peter Austin and Jian Li and Robinson, {David J.} and Henning Prommer and Jing Sun and Jess Oram and Asha Rao",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "157--166",
journal = "Hydrometallurgy",
issn = "0304-386X",
publisher = "CPS/Elsevier",

}

Kuhar, LL, Bunney, K, Jackson, M, Austin, P, Li, J, Robinson, DJ, Prommer, H, Sun, J, Oram, J & Rao, A 2018, 'Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery' Hydrometallurgy, vol. 179, pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.003

Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery. / Kuhar, Laura L.; Bunney, Karl; Jackson, Michael; Austin, Peter; Li, Jian; Robinson, David J.; Prommer, Henning; Sun, Jing; Oram, Jess; Rao, Asha.

In: Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 179, 01.08.2018, p. 157-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of amenability of sandstone-hosted uranium deposit for in-situ recovery

AU - Kuhar, Laura L.

AU - Bunney, Karl

AU - Jackson, Michael

AU - Austin, Peter

AU - Li, Jian

AU - Robinson, David J.

AU - Prommer, Henning

AU - Sun, Jing

AU - Oram, Jess

AU - Rao, Asha

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Laboratory studies to characterise mineralogy and hydrometallurgical behaviour can be used as an essential and critical sub-component of field leach trials to reduce the risk associated with the implementation of an in-situ recovery process. Sample characterisation, bottle-roll leach tests, column leach tests and ion-exchange studies were conducted on samples from the sandstone-hosted Bennet Well deposit (Yanrey Station) in Western Australia, to obtain an understanding of the ore properties, leach behaviour and lixiviant/oxidant options, uranium recoveries and impurity treatment with a view to determining the suitability of this deposit for in-situ recovery processing. Drill core samples from the deposit contained coffinite, were suspected to contain autunite, and contained uranium associated with coal particles and titanium oxides. The main gangue mineral was quartz, and moderate quantities of K-feldspar, kaolinite and muscovite were present. Bottle-roll and column leach tests indicated that sulfuric acid or a carbonate/bicarbonate lixiviant would be suitable for leaching, with the former yielding a higher maximum uranium extraction. Acid column tests on five drill core samples from different deposit locations yielded between 57% and 84% uranium extraction, and 32% to 69% uranium extraction was achieved for the carbonate column leach tests, without oxidant addition. Oxidant addition increased the uranium extraction to 93%–98% for the acid column leach tests and 38%–70% for the carbonate column leach tests, however, oxidant addition complicates downstream processing. Column leach tests yielded lower recoveries compared with the bottle-roll leach tests and recoveries are expected to be lower for a field-scale implementation. A number of ion-exchange resins were found to be suitable for uranium recovery, with up to 100% loading and elution achieved in the acid and carbonate systems. This approach provides an experimental guideline for similar application to deposits that may be amenable to ISR processing.

AB - Laboratory studies to characterise mineralogy and hydrometallurgical behaviour can be used as an essential and critical sub-component of field leach trials to reduce the risk associated with the implementation of an in-situ recovery process. Sample characterisation, bottle-roll leach tests, column leach tests and ion-exchange studies were conducted on samples from the sandstone-hosted Bennet Well deposit (Yanrey Station) in Western Australia, to obtain an understanding of the ore properties, leach behaviour and lixiviant/oxidant options, uranium recoveries and impurity treatment with a view to determining the suitability of this deposit for in-situ recovery processing. Drill core samples from the deposit contained coffinite, were suspected to contain autunite, and contained uranium associated with coal particles and titanium oxides. The main gangue mineral was quartz, and moderate quantities of K-feldspar, kaolinite and muscovite were present. Bottle-roll and column leach tests indicated that sulfuric acid or a carbonate/bicarbonate lixiviant would be suitable for leaching, with the former yielding a higher maximum uranium extraction. Acid column tests on five drill core samples from different deposit locations yielded between 57% and 84% uranium extraction, and 32% to 69% uranium extraction was achieved for the carbonate column leach tests, without oxidant addition. Oxidant addition increased the uranium extraction to 93%–98% for the acid column leach tests and 38%–70% for the carbonate column leach tests, however, oxidant addition complicates downstream processing. Column leach tests yielded lower recoveries compared with the bottle-roll leach tests and recoveries are expected to be lower for a field-scale implementation. A number of ion-exchange resins were found to be suitable for uranium recovery, with up to 100% loading and elution achieved in the acid and carbonate systems. This approach provides an experimental guideline for similar application to deposits that may be amenable to ISR processing.

KW - Characterisation

KW - In-situ recovery

KW - Ion exchange

KW - Leaching

KW - Uranium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048719055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 157

EP - 166

JO - Hydrometallurgy

JF - Hydrometallurgy

SN - 0304-386X

ER -