TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending
T2 - A review of the research literature and court decisions
AU - Allan, Alfred
AU - Parry, Catherine
AU - Ferrante, Anna
AU - Gillies, Christine
AU - Griffiths, Catherine
AU - Morgan, Frank
AU - Spiranovic, Caroline
AU - Smallbone, Stephen
AU - Tubex, Hilda
AU - Wong, Stephen C.P.
PY - 2019/3/4
Y1 - 2019/3/4
N2 - The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.
AB - The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85057631555
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242
M3 - Article
C2 - 31984077
SN - 1934-1687
VL - 26
SP - 274
EP - 294
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
IS - 2
ER -