Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending: A review of the research literature and court decisions

Alfred Allan, Catherine Parry, Anna Ferrante, Christine Gillies, Catherine Griffiths, Frank Morgan, Caroline Spiranovic, Stephen Smallbone, Hilda Tubex, Stephen C.P. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-294
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
court decision
offender
Research
Population Groups
decision maker
Mental Health
Weights and Measures
population group
literature
mental health
evidence

Cite this

Allan, Alfred ; Parry, Catherine ; Ferrante, Anna ; Gillies, Christine ; Griffiths, Catherine ; Morgan, Frank ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Smallbone, Stephen ; Tubex, Hilda ; Wong, Stephen C.P. / Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending : A review of the research literature and court decisions. In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2019 ; pp. 274-294.
@article{889e09a4554242aba43e7561549bc28a,
title = "Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending: A review of the research literature and court decisions",
abstract = "The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.",
author = "Alfred Allan and Catherine Parry and Anna Ferrante and Christine Gillies and Catherine Griffiths and Frank Morgan and Caroline Spiranovic and Stephen Smallbone and Hilda Tubex and Wong, {Stephen C.P.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242",
language = "English",
pages = "274--294",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending : A review of the research literature and court decisions. / Allan, Alfred; Parry, Catherine ; Ferrante, Anna; Gillies, Christine; Griffiths, Catherine; Morgan, Frank; Spiranovic, Caroline; Smallbone, Stephen ; Tubex, Hilda; Wong, Stephen C.P.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2019, p. 274-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending

T2 - A review of the research literature and court decisions

AU - Allan, Alfred

AU - Parry, Catherine

AU - Ferrante, Anna

AU - Gillies, Christine

AU - Griffiths, Catherine

AU - Morgan, Frank

AU - Spiranovic, Caroline

AU - Smallbone, Stephen

AU - Tubex, Hilda

AU - Wong, Stephen C.P.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.

AB - The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.

U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242

DO - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242

M3 - Article

SP - 274

EP - 294

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

ER -