Assessing the potential of INFFER to improve management of agro-environmental assets in tuscany

G.C. Pacini, L. Gabellini, A.M. Roberts, C. Vazzana, G. Park, David Pannell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the European Union, as in many parts of the world, there is increasing pressure to demonstrate that environmental projects achieve expected outcomes and are cost-effective. This paper reports on a trial application of an environmental investment framework, the Investment Framework for Environmental Resource (INFFER). The framework, based on benefit:cost analysis principles, was applied to agro-environmental assets in the Mugello and Valdisieve areas of northern Tuscany, Italy. Farmers, environmental and institutional representatives and technical experts took part in the process of identifying agro-environmental assets in the region. A total of 26 assets were identified, and of these, only 2 (the last remaining population of Cistus laurfolius within the natural protected area of local interest (Area Naturale Protetta di Interesse Locale, ANPIL) of Santa Brigida, and the Sant' Antonio forest were selected as having reasonable prospects of progressing to cost-effective projects (benefit:cost ratio>1). Detailed projects were developed for both assets and found to be cost-effective based on available information. While the mindset of being clear about identifying and valuing natural assets was a new concept to participants, overall the process worked well. The factors considered in calculating a benefit:cost ratio, including technical feasibility, adoption and compliance factors, socio-political risks, costs and the likelihood of obtaining long-term funding to maintain project benefits, were all relevant in Tuscany and required the knowledge of local experts. Overall, INFFER appears relevant and useful in an EU context, and, in particular, is highly compatible with the EU Natura 2000 nature and biodiversity policy. © G.C. Pacini et al., 2013.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-232
JournalItalian Journal of Agronomy
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

assets
Italy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cistus
Biodiversity
European Union
Politics
cost benefit analysis
Compliance
funding
compliance
conservation areas
Pressure
biodiversity
farmers
Population

Cite this

Pacini, G.C. ; Gabellini, L. ; Roberts, A.M. ; Vazzana, C. ; Park, G. ; Pannell, David. / Assessing the potential of INFFER to improve management of agro-environmental assets in tuscany. In: Italian Journal of Agronomy. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 224-232.
@article{0d938b026037472d83637beed61d2ca0,
title = "Assessing the potential of INFFER to improve management of agro-environmental assets in tuscany",
abstract = "In the European Union, as in many parts of the world, there is increasing pressure to demonstrate that environmental projects achieve expected outcomes and are cost-effective. This paper reports on a trial application of an environmental investment framework, the Investment Framework for Environmental Resource (INFFER). The framework, based on benefit:cost analysis principles, was applied to agro-environmental assets in the Mugello and Valdisieve areas of northern Tuscany, Italy. Farmers, environmental and institutional representatives and technical experts took part in the process of identifying agro-environmental assets in the region. A total of 26 assets were identified, and of these, only 2 (the last remaining population of Cistus laurfolius within the natural protected area of local interest (Area Naturale Protetta di Interesse Locale, ANPIL) of Santa Brigida, and the Sant' Antonio forest were selected as having reasonable prospects of progressing to cost-effective projects (benefit:cost ratio>1). Detailed projects were developed for both assets and found to be cost-effective based on available information. While the mindset of being clear about identifying and valuing natural assets was a new concept to participants, overall the process worked well. The factors considered in calculating a benefit:cost ratio, including technical feasibility, adoption and compliance factors, socio-political risks, costs and the likelihood of obtaining long-term funding to maintain project benefits, were all relevant in Tuscany and required the knowledge of local experts. Overall, INFFER appears relevant and useful in an EU context, and, in particular, is highly compatible with the EU Natura 2000 nature and biodiversity policy. {\circledC} G.C. Pacini et al., 2013.",
author = "G.C. Pacini and L. Gabellini and A.M. Roberts and C. Vazzana and G. Park and David Pannell",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.4081/ija.2013.e27",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "224--232",
journal = "Italian Journal of Agronomy",
issn = "1125-4718",
publisher = "PagePress",
number = "4",

}

Assessing the potential of INFFER to improve management of agro-environmental assets in tuscany. / Pacini, G.C.; Gabellini, L.; Roberts, A.M.; Vazzana, C.; Park, G.; Pannell, David.

In: Italian Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2013, p. 224-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the potential of INFFER to improve management of agro-environmental assets in tuscany

AU - Pacini, G.C.

AU - Gabellini, L.

AU - Roberts, A.M.

AU - Vazzana, C.

AU - Park, G.

AU - Pannell, David

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the European Union, as in many parts of the world, there is increasing pressure to demonstrate that environmental projects achieve expected outcomes and are cost-effective. This paper reports on a trial application of an environmental investment framework, the Investment Framework for Environmental Resource (INFFER). The framework, based on benefit:cost analysis principles, was applied to agro-environmental assets in the Mugello and Valdisieve areas of northern Tuscany, Italy. Farmers, environmental and institutional representatives and technical experts took part in the process of identifying agro-environmental assets in the region. A total of 26 assets were identified, and of these, only 2 (the last remaining population of Cistus laurfolius within the natural protected area of local interest (Area Naturale Protetta di Interesse Locale, ANPIL) of Santa Brigida, and the Sant' Antonio forest were selected as having reasonable prospects of progressing to cost-effective projects (benefit:cost ratio>1). Detailed projects were developed for both assets and found to be cost-effective based on available information. While the mindset of being clear about identifying and valuing natural assets was a new concept to participants, overall the process worked well. The factors considered in calculating a benefit:cost ratio, including technical feasibility, adoption and compliance factors, socio-political risks, costs and the likelihood of obtaining long-term funding to maintain project benefits, were all relevant in Tuscany and required the knowledge of local experts. Overall, INFFER appears relevant and useful in an EU context, and, in particular, is highly compatible with the EU Natura 2000 nature and biodiversity policy. © G.C. Pacini et al., 2013.

AB - In the European Union, as in many parts of the world, there is increasing pressure to demonstrate that environmental projects achieve expected outcomes and are cost-effective. This paper reports on a trial application of an environmental investment framework, the Investment Framework for Environmental Resource (INFFER). The framework, based on benefit:cost analysis principles, was applied to agro-environmental assets in the Mugello and Valdisieve areas of northern Tuscany, Italy. Farmers, environmental and institutional representatives and technical experts took part in the process of identifying agro-environmental assets in the region. A total of 26 assets were identified, and of these, only 2 (the last remaining population of Cistus laurfolius within the natural protected area of local interest (Area Naturale Protetta di Interesse Locale, ANPIL) of Santa Brigida, and the Sant' Antonio forest were selected as having reasonable prospects of progressing to cost-effective projects (benefit:cost ratio>1). Detailed projects were developed for both assets and found to be cost-effective based on available information. While the mindset of being clear about identifying and valuing natural assets was a new concept to participants, overall the process worked well. The factors considered in calculating a benefit:cost ratio, including technical feasibility, adoption and compliance factors, socio-political risks, costs and the likelihood of obtaining long-term funding to maintain project benefits, were all relevant in Tuscany and required the knowledge of local experts. Overall, INFFER appears relevant and useful in an EU context, and, in particular, is highly compatible with the EU Natura 2000 nature and biodiversity policy. © G.C. Pacini et al., 2013.

U2 - 10.4081/ija.2013.e27

DO - 10.4081/ija.2013.e27

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 224

EP - 232

JO - Italian Journal of Agronomy

JF - Italian Journal of Agronomy

SN - 1125-4718

IS - 4

ER -