Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines

Daniel Green; Arno Greylinf; Anke Van Mil; Peter Zock; Lorenzo  Ghiadoni; Dick H J Thijssen

doi:10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines

Daniel Green, Arno Greylinf, Anke Van Mil, Peter Zock, Lorenzo Ghiadoni , Dick H J Thijssen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Data article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. Adherence to expert consensus guidelines on FMD measurement has been found to be of vital importance to obtain reproducible data. This article lists the literature data which was considered in the development of a tool to aid in the objective judgement of the extent to which published studies adhered to expert guidelines for FMD measurement. Application of this tool in a systematic review of FMD studies (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.011) (Greyling et al., 2016 [1]) indicated that adherence to expert consensus guidelines is strongly correlated to the reproducibility of FMD data.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	73-77
Number of pages	5
Journal	Data in Brief
Volume	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2016

Access to Document

10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Green, D., Greylinf, A., Van Mil, A., Zock, P., Ghiadoni , L., & Thijssen, D. H. J. (2016). Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines. Data in Brief, 8, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

@article{5f4d66ed4683422587cc3062c9f520f6,

title = "Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines",

abstract = "Brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. Adherence to expert consensus guidelines on FMD measurement has been found to be of vital importance to obtain reproducible data. This article lists the literature data which was considered in the development of a tool to aid in the objective judgement of the extent to which published studies adhered to expert guidelines for FMD measurement. Application of this tool in a systematic review of FMD studies (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.011) (Greyling et al., 2016 [1]) indicated that adherence to expert consensus guidelines is strongly correlated to the reproducibility of FMD data.",

author = "Daniel Green and Arno Greylinf and {Van Mil}, Anke and Peter Zock and Lorenzo Ghiadoni and Thijssen, {Dick H J}",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "73--77",

journal = "Data in Brief",

issn = "2352-3409",

publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Green, D, Greylinf, A, Van Mil, A, Zock, P, Ghiadoni , L & Thijssen, DHJ 2016, 'Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines', Data in Brief, vol. 8, pp. 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines. / Green, Daniel; Greylinf, Arno; Van Mil, Anke et al.
In: Data in Brief, Vol. 8, 01.09.2016, p. 73-77.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Data article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines

AU - Green, Daniel

AU - Greylinf, Arno

AU - Van Mil, Anke

AU - Zock, Peter

AU - Ghiadoni , Lorenzo

AU - Thijssen, Dick H J

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. Adherence to expert consensus guidelines on FMD measurement has been found to be of vital importance to obtain reproducible data. This article lists the literature data which was considered in the development of a tool to aid in the objective judgement of the extent to which published studies adhered to expert guidelines for FMD measurement. Application of this tool in a systematic review of FMD studies (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.011) (Greyling et al., 2016 [1]) indicated that adherence to expert consensus guidelines is strongly correlated to the reproducibility of FMD data.

AB - Brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. Adherence to expert consensus guidelines on FMD measurement has been found to be of vital importance to obtain reproducible data. This article lists the literature data which was considered in the development of a tool to aid in the objective judgement of the extent to which published studies adhered to expert guidelines for FMD measurement. Application of this tool in a systematic review of FMD studies (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.011) (Greyling et al., 2016 [1]) indicated that adherence to expert consensus guidelines is strongly correlated to the reproducibility of FMD data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969718627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

M3 - Data article

C2 - 27284565

SN - 2352-3409

VL - 8

SP - 73

EP - 77

JO - Data in Brief

JF - Data in Brief

ER -

Green D, Greylinf A, Van Mil A, Zock P, Ghiadoni L, Thijssen DHJ. Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines. Data in Brief. 2016 Sept 1;8:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.011

Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this