Abstract: This paper examines the nature of some of the archaeological evidence used in the De Rose Hill native title claim. The archaeological evidence was not a point of contestation in this claim. Archaeological evidence gathered by the claimants' archaeologist and the Crown's archaeologist was seen as supporting several important components of the Native Title Act 1993. The methodological implications of collecting evidence for native title claims are discussed in terms of the broader ramifications for archaeological practice.
|Number of pages||15|
|Specialist publication||Australian Aboriginal Studies: Journal of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.|
|Publication status||Published - 2005|