Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis

J.P. Hausknecht, David Day, S.C. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

558 Citations (Scopus)


An updated theoretical model of applicant reactions to selection procedures is proposed and tested using meta-analysis. Results from 86 independent samples (N = 48,750) indicated that applicants who hold positive perceptions about selection are more likely to view the organization favorably and report stronger intentions to accept job offers and recommend the employer to others. Applicant perceptions were positively correlated with actual and perceived performance on selection tools and with self-perceptions. The average correlation between applicant perceptions and gender, age, and ethnic background was near zero. Face validity and perceived predictive validity were strong predictors of many applicant perceptions including procedural justice, distributive justice, attitudes towards tests, and attitudes towards selection. Interviews and work samples were perceived more favorably than cognitive ability tests, which were perceived more favorably than personality inventories, honesty tests, biodata, and graphology. The discussion identifies remaining theoretical and methodological issues as well as directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-683
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2004


Dive into the research topics of 'Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this