Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 15 is May 7, 2019. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-554
Number of pages26
JournalAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology
Volume15
Early online dateJan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2019

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Clinical Psychology
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Publications
Attentional Bias

Cite this

@article{8c08bd89084f4c2c99a1b4a6b192cc58,
title = "Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?",
abstract = "There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 15 is May 7, 2019. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.",
author = "Colin MacLeod and Ben Grafton and Lies Notebaert",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "529--554",
journal = "Annual Review of Clinical Psychology",
issn = "1548-5943",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias : Is It Reliable? / MacLeod, Colin; Grafton, Ben; Notebaert, Lies.

In: Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 15, 07.05.2019, p. 529-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias

T2 - Is It Reliable?

AU - MacLeod, Colin

AU - Grafton, Ben

AU - Notebaert, Lies

PY - 2019/5/7

Y1 - 2019/5/7

N2 - There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 15 is May 7, 2019. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

AB - There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 15 is May 7, 2019. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505

DO - 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 529

EP - 554

JO - Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

JF - Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

SN - 1548-5943

ER -