Anthropology Pure and Profane: The Politics of Applied Research in Aboriginal Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is there a view that academic anthropology operates or belongs in a 'sacred' space that is distinguishable from applied research occupying a less pure, intellectually inferior and more morally profane domain? Certainly, in my experience of some thirty plus years of work in Australian Aboriginal studies, such a distinction has at times been both promoted and contested vigorously. I outline my reading of the recent debate focusing particularly on writings from those concerned about the moral and political standing of applied anthropology. I also address the proposition that applied work is intellectually inadequate, particularly in being incapable of analysis of cultural change. Prompted by the critiques of applied anthropology, I reflect upon my own research career's blending of both academic and applied work. The paper addresses some case material enabling presentation of my perspective on the positive contribution of engagement beyond the academy in Australian Aboriginal anthropology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-255
Number of pages23
JournalAnthropological Forum
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropology Pure and Profane: The Politics of Applied Research in Aboriginal Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this