TY - JOUR
T1 - Antarctic geothermal heat flow and its implications for tectonics and ice sheets
AU - Reading, Anya M.
AU - Stål, Tobias
AU - Halpin, Jacqueline A.
AU - Lösing, Mareen
AU - Ebbing, Jörg
AU - Shen, Weisen
AU - McCormack, Felicity S.
AU - Siddoway, Christine S.
AU - Hasterok, Derrick
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Australian Research Council (ARC), through ARC DP190100418 (A.M.R., T.S.). Additional support was provided through ARC SRI Antarctica Gateway Partnership, SR140300001 (T.S.), ARC SRI Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, SR200100008 (A.M.R., T.S., J.A.H.), ARC DP180104074 (J.A.H., D.H.), ARC DECRA DE210101433 (F.S.M.) and ARC SRI Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future SR200100005 (F.S.M.). Further support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the priority programme ‘Antarctic Research with comparative investigations in Arctic ice areas’ SPP 1158 (grant no. EB 255/8-1, M.L., J.E.). The authors thank the many participants of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, Scientific Research Program on Solid Earth Response and influence on Cryosphere Evolution (SCAR, SERCE, to 2020) and its successor, Instabilities and Thresholds in Antarctica, subcommittee on Geothermal Heat Flow (SCAR, INSTANT, from 2021) for discussions that informed this Review.
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Australian Research Council (ARC), through ARC DP190100418 (A.M.R., T.S.). Additional support was provided through ARC SRI Antarctica Gateway Partnership, SR140300001 (T.S.), ARC SRI Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, SR200100008 (A.M.R., T.S., J.A.H.), ARC DP180104074 (J.A.H., D.H.) and ARC DECRA DE210101433 (F.S.M.). Further support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the priority programme ‘Antarctic Research with comparative investigations in Arctic ice areas’ SPP 1158 (grant no. EB 255/8-1, M.L., J.E.). The authors thank the many participants of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, Scientific Research Program on Solid Earth Response and influence on Cryosphere Evolution (SCAR, SERCE, to 2020) and its successor, Instabilities and Thresholds in Antarctica, subcommittee on Geothermal Heat Flow (SCAR, INSTANT, from 2021) for discussions that informed this Review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Geothermal heat flow (GHF) is an elusive physical property, yet it can reveal past and present plate tectonic processes. In Antarctica, GHF has further consequences in predicting the response of ice sheets to climate change. In this Review, we discuss variations in Antarctic GHF models based on geophysical methods and draw insights into tectonics and GHF model usage for ice sheet modelling. The inferred GHF at continental scale for West Antarctica (up to 119 mW m−2, 95th percentile) points to numerous contributing influences, including non-steady state neotectonic processes. Combined influences cause especially high values in the vicinity of the Thwaites Glacier, a location critical for the accurate prediction of accelerated loss of Antarctic ice mass. The inferred variations across East Antarctica are more subtle (up to 66 mW m−2, 95th percentile), where slightly elevated values in some locations correspond to the influence of thinned lithosphere and tectonic units with concentrations of heat-producing elements. Fine-scale anomalies owing to heat-producing elements and horizontal components of heat flow are important for regional modelling. GHF maps comprising central values with these fine-scale anomalies captured within uncertainty bounds can thus enable improved ensemble-based ice sheet model predictions of Antarctic ice loss.
AB - Geothermal heat flow (GHF) is an elusive physical property, yet it can reveal past and present plate tectonic processes. In Antarctica, GHF has further consequences in predicting the response of ice sheets to climate change. In this Review, we discuss variations in Antarctic GHF models based on geophysical methods and draw insights into tectonics and GHF model usage for ice sheet modelling. The inferred GHF at continental scale for West Antarctica (up to 119 mW m−2, 95th percentile) points to numerous contributing influences, including non-steady state neotectonic processes. Combined influences cause especially high values in the vicinity of the Thwaites Glacier, a location critical for the accurate prediction of accelerated loss of Antarctic ice mass. The inferred variations across East Antarctica are more subtle (up to 66 mW m−2, 95th percentile), where slightly elevated values in some locations correspond to the influence of thinned lithosphere and tectonic units with concentrations of heat-producing elements. Fine-scale anomalies owing to heat-producing elements and horizontal components of heat flow are important for regional modelling. GHF maps comprising central values with these fine-scale anomalies captured within uncertainty bounds can thus enable improved ensemble-based ice sheet model predictions of Antarctic ice loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140609710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s43017-022-00348-y
DO - 10.1038/s43017-022-00348-y
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85140609710
SN - 2662-138X
VL - 3
SP - 814
EP - 831
JO - Nature Reviews Earth and Environment
JF - Nature Reviews Earth and Environment
IS - 12
ER -