Andrew Bolt and ACMA: should ‘hyperbole’ get in the way of accuracy?

Steven Maras

Andrew Bolt and ACMA: should ‘hyperbole’ get in the way of accuracy?

School of Social Sciences

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article in specialist publication

Abstract

An ACMA investigation of Andrew Bolt raises questions of fair and accurate reporting, the clash over facts, fair comment and the right of readers and viewers.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The Conversation
Publication status	Published - 10 Aug 2016

Access to Document

https://theconversation.com/andrew-bolt-and-acma-should-hyperbole-get-in-the-way-of-accuracy-63695

Cite this

@misc{4b4c19e445a044d1a5afdea40ef3d1f4,

title = "Andrew Bolt and ACMA: should {\textquoteleft}hyperbole{\textquoteright} get in the way of accuracy?",

abstract = "An ACMA investigation of Andrew Bolt raises questions of fair and accurate reporting, the clash over facts, fair comment and the right of readers and viewers.",

author = "Steven Maras",

year = "2016",

month = aug,

day = "10",

language = "English",

journal = "The Conversation",

issn = "2201-5639",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Andrew Bolt and ACMA

T2 - should ‘hyperbole’ get in the way of accuracy?

AU - Maras, Steven

PY - 2016/8/10

Y1 - 2016/8/10

N2 - An ACMA investigation of Andrew Bolt raises questions of fair and accurate reporting, the clash over facts, fair comment and the right of readers and viewers.

AB - An ACMA investigation of Andrew Bolt raises questions of fair and accurate reporting, the clash over facts, fair comment and the right of readers and viewers.

M3 - Article in specialist publication

SN - 2201-5639

JO - The Conversation

JF - The Conversation

ER -

Andrew Bolt and ACMA: should ‘hyperbole’ get in the way of accuracy?

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this