An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems

Thomas Kozak, Stefan Bauer, Gilles Walch, Saad Al-Karawi, William Blakeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was originally developed because of unsatisfactory results with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty options for the majority of degenerative shoulder conditions and fractures.After initial concerns about RTSA longevity, indications were extended to primary osteoarthritis with glenoid deficiency, massive cuff tears in younger patients, fracture, tumour and failed anatomic total shoulder replacement.Traditional RTSA by Grammont has undergone a number of iterations such as glenoid lateralization, reduced neck-shaft angle, modular, stemless components and onlay systems.The incidence of complications such as dislocation, notching and acromial fractures has also evolved.Computer navigation, 3D planning and patient-specific implantation have been in use for several years and mixed-reality guided implantation is currently being trialled.Controversies in RTSA include lateralization, stemless humeral components, subscapularis repair and treatment of acromial fractures. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:189-201. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-201
Number of pages13
JournalEFORT open reviews
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this