An extended interpretation of the free-fall piezocone test in clay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seabed strength may be determined rapidly using free-fall penetrometers as the tool is simply released from above the sea-floor and penetrates under gravity into the seabed. The speed and ease of deployment relative to conventional ‘push-in’ penetrometers is attractive, with the trade-off of more complex interpretation. This paper considers two approaches for deducing the undrained shear strength from a slender conical tipped penetrometer. The first requires as input only the vertical acceleration of the penetrometer, where the soil strength is determined indirectly by considering the various forces acting on the penetrometer and solving the equation of motion. The second determines the undrained shear strength more directly by combining tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements. In both cases, adjustments for drag resistance and strain-rate effects are necessary to deduce a strength compatible with that determined from the equivalent push-in penetrometer test. Application of both methods to a series of centrifuge tests in normally consolidated kaolin clay reveals that the direct method – using the tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements – is much more reliable and can produce strength profiles that are within 10% of those obtained from push-in piezocone tests, compared with variations of up to 75% for the indirect accelerometer based method, which requires additional assumptions. The centrifuge study also provides direct quantification of the strain rate enhancement of tip and shaft resistance, revealing much higher strain rate dependency for shaft resistance than is typically allowed for.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1090-1103
JournalGéotechnique
Volume67
Issue number12
Early online date20 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

penetrometer
Strain rate
Clay
Pore pressure
Centrifuges
Pressure measurement
clay
Shear strength
strain rate
Kaolin
centrifuge
Accelerometers
shaft
pore pressure
shear strength
Equations of motion
Drag
Gravitation
Soils
soil strength

Cite this

@article{b7d5ac69d3ea4e1bb67da6495c26e955,
title = "An extended interpretation of the free-fall piezocone test in clay",
abstract = "Seabed strength may be determined rapidly using free-fall penetrometers as the tool is simply released from above the sea-floor and penetrates under gravity into the seabed. The speed and ease of deployment relative to conventional ‘push-in’ penetrometers is attractive, with the trade-off of more complex interpretation. This paper considers two approaches for deducing the undrained shear strength from a slender conical tipped penetrometer. The first requires as input only the vertical acceleration of the penetrometer, where the soil strength is determined indirectly by considering the various forces acting on the penetrometer and solving the equation of motion. The second determines the undrained shear strength more directly by combining tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements. In both cases, adjustments for drag resistance and strain-rate effects are necessary to deduce a strength compatible with that determined from the equivalent push-in penetrometer test. Application of both methods to a series of centrifuge tests in normally consolidated kaolin clay reveals that the direct method – using the tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements – is much more reliable and can produce strength profiles that are within 10{\%} of those obtained from push-in piezocone tests, compared with variations of up to 75{\%} for the indirect accelerometer based method, which requires additional assumptions. The centrifuge study also provides direct quantification of the strain rate enhancement of tip and shaft resistance, revealing much higher strain rate dependency for shaft resistance than is typically allowed for.",
author = "Shiaohuey Chow and Conleth O'Loughlin and David White and Mark Randolph",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/jgeot.16.P.220",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1090--1103",
journal = "G{\'e}otechnique",
issn = "0016-8505",
publisher = "ICE Publishing Company",
number = "12",

}

An extended interpretation of the free-fall piezocone test in clay. / Chow, Shiaohuey; O'Loughlin, Conleth; White, David; Randolph, Mark.

In: Géotechnique, Vol. 67, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 1090-1103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An extended interpretation of the free-fall piezocone test in clay

AU - Chow, Shiaohuey

AU - O'Loughlin, Conleth

AU - White, David

AU - Randolph, Mark

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Seabed strength may be determined rapidly using free-fall penetrometers as the tool is simply released from above the sea-floor and penetrates under gravity into the seabed. The speed and ease of deployment relative to conventional ‘push-in’ penetrometers is attractive, with the trade-off of more complex interpretation. This paper considers two approaches for deducing the undrained shear strength from a slender conical tipped penetrometer. The first requires as input only the vertical acceleration of the penetrometer, where the soil strength is determined indirectly by considering the various forces acting on the penetrometer and solving the equation of motion. The second determines the undrained shear strength more directly by combining tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements. In both cases, adjustments for drag resistance and strain-rate effects are necessary to deduce a strength compatible with that determined from the equivalent push-in penetrometer test. Application of both methods to a series of centrifuge tests in normally consolidated kaolin clay reveals that the direct method – using the tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements – is much more reliable and can produce strength profiles that are within 10% of those obtained from push-in piezocone tests, compared with variations of up to 75% for the indirect accelerometer based method, which requires additional assumptions. The centrifuge study also provides direct quantification of the strain rate enhancement of tip and shaft resistance, revealing much higher strain rate dependency for shaft resistance than is typically allowed for.

AB - Seabed strength may be determined rapidly using free-fall penetrometers as the tool is simply released from above the sea-floor and penetrates under gravity into the seabed. The speed and ease of deployment relative to conventional ‘push-in’ penetrometers is attractive, with the trade-off of more complex interpretation. This paper considers two approaches for deducing the undrained shear strength from a slender conical tipped penetrometer. The first requires as input only the vertical acceleration of the penetrometer, where the soil strength is determined indirectly by considering the various forces acting on the penetrometer and solving the equation of motion. The second determines the undrained shear strength more directly by combining tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements. In both cases, adjustments for drag resistance and strain-rate effects are necessary to deduce a strength compatible with that determined from the equivalent push-in penetrometer test. Application of both methods to a series of centrifuge tests in normally consolidated kaolin clay reveals that the direct method – using the tip load cell and u2 pore pressure measurements – is much more reliable and can produce strength profiles that are within 10% of those obtained from push-in piezocone tests, compared with variations of up to 75% for the indirect accelerometer based method, which requires additional assumptions. The centrifuge study also provides direct quantification of the strain rate enhancement of tip and shaft resistance, revealing much higher strain rate dependency for shaft resistance than is typically allowed for.

U2 - 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.220

DO - 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.220

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 1090

EP - 1103

JO - Géotechnique

JF - Géotechnique

SN - 0016-8505

IS - 12

ER -