An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century

Sanjivan Kandasamy, Charles S. Greene, Ales Obrez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The concept and application of a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) relationship identified as centric relation (CR) has changed significantly over the past century. Originally proposed as a biologically reasonable position where maxillary and mandibular dentures should occlude, it later was applied to the dentate population as well. The term "ideal" was used by the gnathologic dental community as they sought to define the exact details of CR in terms of condyle-fossa relationships. Assessments of patients' occlusion were then made in relation to CR, and discrepancies between the two positions were described as being problematic. Since not all dentists have accepted this concept, the clinical application of CR has become a topic of major dental confusion and controversy. To further complicate things, the formal definitions of CR have continuously changed over the past 40 years. In this paper, the biologic development of occlusal and TMJ relationships is reviewed, followed by a discussion about the validity of applying CR concepts and procedures in contemporary clinical and research settings. Special attention is devoted to the alleged relationships between occlusion, jaw positions, and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Current evidence suggests that it is time to stop applying CR concepts to the evaluation and dental treatment of healthy dentate individuals. For patients with TMDs, it is time to apply current concepts of biopsychosocial assessment and management rather than following the 20th century mechanistic models of fixing dental and skeletal malalignments.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number30202837
    Pages (from-to)755-760
    Number of pages6
    JournalQuintessence International
    Volume49
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Cite this

    Kandasamy, Sanjivan ; Greene, Charles S. ; Obrez, Ales. / An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century. In: Quintessence International. 2018 ; Vol. 49, No. 9. pp. 755-760.
    @article{58a9db30edf84689a31551b2d38d66c0,
    title = "An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century",
    abstract = "The concept and application of a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) relationship identified as centric relation (CR) has changed significantly over the past century. Originally proposed as a biologically reasonable position where maxillary and mandibular dentures should occlude, it later was applied to the dentate population as well. The term {"}ideal{"} was used by the gnathologic dental community as they sought to define the exact details of CR in terms of condyle-fossa relationships. Assessments of patients' occlusion were then made in relation to CR, and discrepancies between the two positions were described as being problematic. Since not all dentists have accepted this concept, the clinical application of CR has become a topic of major dental confusion and controversy. To further complicate things, the formal definitions of CR have continuously changed over the past 40 years. In this paper, the biologic development of occlusal and TMJ relationships is reviewed, followed by a discussion about the validity of applying CR concepts and procedures in contemporary clinical and research settings. Special attention is devoted to the alleged relationships between occlusion, jaw positions, and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Current evidence suggests that it is time to stop applying CR concepts to the evaluation and dental treatment of healthy dentate individuals. For patients with TMDs, it is time to apply current concepts of biopsychosocial assessment and management rather than following the 20th century mechanistic models of fixing dental and skeletal malalignments.",
    keywords = "occlusion, orthodontics, prosthodontics, restorative dentistry, temporomandibular joint, INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL TELEMETRY, TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS, TOOTH CONTACTS, ARTICULATOR MOUNTINGS, CONDYLAR POSITION, ORTHODONTICS, PERSPECTIVE, JOINT",
    author = "Sanjivan Kandasamy and Greene, {Charles S.} and Ales Obrez",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.3290/j.qi.a41011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "49",
    pages = "755--760",
    journal = "Quintessence International",
    issn = "0011-8567",
    publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc",
    number = "9",

    }

    An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century. / Kandasamy, Sanjivan; Greene, Charles S.; Obrez, Ales.

    In: Quintessence International, Vol. 49, No. 9, 30202837, 10.2018, p. 755-760.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century

    AU - Kandasamy, Sanjivan

    AU - Greene, Charles S.

    AU - Obrez, Ales

    PY - 2018/10

    Y1 - 2018/10

    N2 - The concept and application of a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) relationship identified as centric relation (CR) has changed significantly over the past century. Originally proposed as a biologically reasonable position where maxillary and mandibular dentures should occlude, it later was applied to the dentate population as well. The term "ideal" was used by the gnathologic dental community as they sought to define the exact details of CR in terms of condyle-fossa relationships. Assessments of patients' occlusion were then made in relation to CR, and discrepancies between the two positions were described as being problematic. Since not all dentists have accepted this concept, the clinical application of CR has become a topic of major dental confusion and controversy. To further complicate things, the formal definitions of CR have continuously changed over the past 40 years. In this paper, the biologic development of occlusal and TMJ relationships is reviewed, followed by a discussion about the validity of applying CR concepts and procedures in contemporary clinical and research settings. Special attention is devoted to the alleged relationships between occlusion, jaw positions, and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Current evidence suggests that it is time to stop applying CR concepts to the evaluation and dental treatment of healthy dentate individuals. For patients with TMDs, it is time to apply current concepts of biopsychosocial assessment and management rather than following the 20th century mechanistic models of fixing dental and skeletal malalignments.

    AB - The concept and application of a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) relationship identified as centric relation (CR) has changed significantly over the past century. Originally proposed as a biologically reasonable position where maxillary and mandibular dentures should occlude, it later was applied to the dentate population as well. The term "ideal" was used by the gnathologic dental community as they sought to define the exact details of CR in terms of condyle-fossa relationships. Assessments of patients' occlusion were then made in relation to CR, and discrepancies between the two positions were described as being problematic. Since not all dentists have accepted this concept, the clinical application of CR has become a topic of major dental confusion and controversy. To further complicate things, the formal definitions of CR have continuously changed over the past 40 years. In this paper, the biologic development of occlusal and TMJ relationships is reviewed, followed by a discussion about the validity of applying CR concepts and procedures in contemporary clinical and research settings. Special attention is devoted to the alleged relationships between occlusion, jaw positions, and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Current evidence suggests that it is time to stop applying CR concepts to the evaluation and dental treatment of healthy dentate individuals. For patients with TMDs, it is time to apply current concepts of biopsychosocial assessment and management rather than following the 20th century mechanistic models of fixing dental and skeletal malalignments.

    KW - occlusion

    KW - orthodontics

    KW - prosthodontics

    KW - restorative dentistry

    KW - temporomandibular joint

    KW - INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL TELEMETRY

    KW - TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS

    KW - TOOTH CONTACTS

    KW - ARTICULATOR MOUNTINGS

    KW - CONDYLAR POSITION

    KW - ORTHODONTICS

    KW - PERSPECTIVE

    KW - JOINT

    U2 - 10.3290/j.qi.a41011

    DO - 10.3290/j.qi.a41011

    M3 - Article

    VL - 49

    SP - 755

    EP - 760

    JO - Quintessence International

    JF - Quintessence International

    SN - 0011-8567

    IS - 9

    M1 - 30202837

    ER -