Abstract
This article examines the United Kingdom Supreme Court decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. The case centred on whether damages could be awarded for the cost of a commercial surrogacy arrangement in California, following clinical negligence by the hospital that left the plaintiff unable to carry her own children. After examination of this case, the article outlines and compares the United Kingdom and Australian surrogacy laws. It then discusses how a similar case would be decided in Australia and argues that the result would be the same in some Australian States. It also discusses the concept of reproductive autonomy and the importance of this concept when considering cases involving the loss of fertility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 166-178 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Law and Medicine |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
