Against Lottocracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with democratic institutions has run high in recent years. Perhaps as a result, political theorists have begun to turn their attention to possible alternative modes of political decision-making. Many of the most interesting among these involve reliance on lotteries in one way or another – as a means of distributing the franchise, selecting representatives, or making social choices. Advocates of these ‘lottocratic’ systems contend that they retain the egalitarian appeal of democracy, while promising improved political outcomes. The aim of this article is to defend democracy (or, at least, universal suffrage and majority rule) against the challenge posed by these proposals. I argue, firstly, that lottocratic systems necessarily involve the establishment of objectionable social and political inequalities in a way that democracies do not. Secondly, I raise a number of doubts with respect to the purported instrumental benefits of these proposals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Political theory
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Against Lottocracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this