Adoption of integrated weed management by grain growers

Rick Llewellyn

    Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

    117 Downloads (Pure)


    [Truncated] Modern cropping systems throughout the world are highly dependent on herbicides for weed control. Herbicide resistance threatens the sustainability of these cropping systems. Growers are being encouraged to adopt integrated weed management (IWM) practices that place less reliance on herbicides to delay, if not prevent, further resistance development. This study examines the factors influencing the adoption of IWM by Australian grain growers, and opportunities for extension to improve herbicide resistance management. In Australia, grain growers face one of the most challenging resistance problems, with the major weed, annual ryegrass, being most commonly affected. In a field survey conducted as part of this study, a majority of cropping fields in the Western Australian wheatbelt were found to contain a resistant population. However, resistance to all herbicides available for the in-crop control of ryegrass remains uncommon, suggesting that all growers still have the opportunity to conserve herbicide susceptibility. A framework for understanding the adoption of IWM practices was developed. Essentially grain growers are seen to be managing a potentially exhaustible resource, herbicide susceptibility, and to select the optimal level of exploitation of that resource over time.
    Original languageEnglish
    QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
    Awarding Institution
    • The University of Western Australia
    Publication statusUnpublished - 2002

    Take-down notice

    • This thesis has been made available in the UWA Profiles and Research Repository as part of a UWA Library project to digitise and make available theses completed before 2003. If you are the author of this thesis and would like it removed from the UWA Profiles and Research Repository, please contact


    Dive into the research topics of 'Adoption of integrated weed management by grain growers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this