TY - JOUR
T1 - Administrative Costs and Instrument Choice for Stochastic Non-point Source Pollutants
AU - Kampas, A.
AU - White, Ben
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - This paper extends the empiricalanalysis of non-point source pollution to thecase where the pollutant is stochastic andalternative regulatory instruments havedifferent administrative costs. It also appliesa method of stochastic programming whereemissions are log-normally distributed. Forthe Kennet catchment in South West England werank a range of policies in terms of abatementcosts alone, and total costs (abatement andadministrative costs). On the basis ofabatement costs alone, a uniform emission taxis the cost minimising policy, but on the basisof total cost a nitrogen input tax is theleast-cost policy. Furthermore, the policyranking, based on total costs, changes as thereliability standard increases.
AB - This paper extends the empiricalanalysis of non-point source pollution to thecase where the pollutant is stochastic andalternative regulatory instruments havedifferent administrative costs. It also appliesa method of stochastic programming whereemissions are log-normally distributed. Forthe Kennet catchment in South West England werank a range of policies in terms of abatementcosts alone, and total costs (abatement andadministrative costs). On the basis ofabatement costs alone, a uniform emission taxis the cost minimising policy, but on the basisof total cost a nitrogen input tax is theleast-cost policy. Furthermore, the policyranking, based on total costs, changes as thereliability standard increases.
U2 - 10.1023/B:EARE.0000017275.44350.e5
DO - 10.1023/B:EARE.0000017275.44350.e5
M3 - Article
SN - 0924-6460
VL - 27
SP - 109
EP - 133
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
IS - 2
ER -