Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation

Mohamed M. Awad; Feras Alhalabi; Mohamed Bamuqadm; Abdulmalik Alhoti; Abdulilah Almasaad; Ali Robiaan; Ahmed Almahdy; Ali Alrahlah; Mohammed H. Ahmed

doi:10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3

Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation

Mohamed M. Awad, Feras Alhalabi, Mohamed Bamuqadm, Abdulmalik Alhoti, Abdulilah Almasaad, Ali Robiaan, Ahmed Almahdy, Ali Alrahlah, Mohammed H. Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive sonic agitation on resin–dentin micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation. Seventy-two molars with prepared class-II cavities were divided into six groups (n = 12) according to the bonding mode; etch-and-rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) and application protocol of the universal adhesive (UA) employed (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake); following the manufacturer instructions (MI), manual agitation for 20 s (20s), or sonic agitation for 20 s using a modified sonic micro-brush mounted on EndoActivator device, Dentsply Sirona, (sonic). Restored teeth were sectioned into resin–dentin beams and slaps and µTBS was evaluated at 1 week (1w) and after thermocycling (10k). µTBS data were analyzed using the linear mixed-effects modeling with specific contrast (p < 0.05). The resin–dentin interfacial morphology was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. Adhesive sonic agitation resulted in significantly higher µTBS means in both E&R and SE modes, compared to MI group. The µTBS of MI group showed significant reduction upon aging when applied in SE mode. Sonic agitation was associated with enhanced adhesive infiltration into dentin specially in E&R mode. Sonic agitation of UA using modified sonic micro-brush attached to EndoActivator device significantly improved the resin–dentin µTBS and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	409-419
Number of pages	11
Journal	Odontology
Volume	111
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3
Publication status	Published - Apr 2023
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3

Cite this

@article{69d476ac437f44328c464cf86d246e01,

title = "Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive sonic agitation on resin–dentin micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation. Seventy-two molars with prepared class-II cavities were divided into six groups (n = 12) according to the bonding mode; etch-and-rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) and application protocol of the universal adhesive (UA) employed (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake); following the manufacturer instructions (MI), manual agitation for 20 s (20s), or sonic agitation for 20 s using a modified sonic micro-brush mounted on EndoActivator device, Dentsply Sirona, (sonic). Restored teeth were sectioned into resin–dentin beams and slaps and µTBS was evaluated at 1 week (1w) and after thermocycling (10k). µTBS data were analyzed using the linear mixed-effects modeling with specific contrast (p < 0.05). The resin–dentin interfacial morphology was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. Adhesive sonic agitation resulted in significantly higher µTBS means in both E&R and SE modes, compared to MI group. The µTBS of MI group showed significant reduction upon aging when applied in SE mode. Sonic agitation was associated with enhanced adhesive infiltration into dentin specially in E&R mode. Sonic agitation of UA using modified sonic micro-brush attached to EndoActivator device significantly improved the resin–dentin µTBS and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation.",

keywords = "Adhesive application, Interfacial morphology, Microtensile bond strength, Resin–dentin bonding, Sonic agitation",

author = "Awad, {Mohamed M.} and Feras Alhalabi and Mohamed Bamuqadm and Abdulmalik Alhoti and Abdulilah Almasaad and Ali Robiaan and Ahmed Almahdy and Ali Alrahlah and Ahmed, {Mohammed H.}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding this study through the Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs and Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, Engineer Abdullah Bugshan. The authors are grateful to Dentsply for their support providing EndoActivator device. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3",

language = "English",

volume = "111",

pages = "409--419",

journal = "Odontology",

issn = "1618-1247",

publisher = "Society of Nippon Dental University",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation

AU - Awad, Mohamed M.

AU - Alhalabi, Feras

AU - Bamuqadm, Mohamed

AU - Alhoti, Abdulmalik

AU - Almasaad, Abdulilah

AU - Robiaan, Ali

AU - Almahdy, Ahmed

AU - Alrahlah, Ali

AU - Ahmed, Mohammed H.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding this study through the Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs and Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, Engineer Abdullah Bugshan. The authors are grateful to Dentsply for their support providing EndoActivator device. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive sonic agitation on resin–dentin micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation. Seventy-two molars with prepared class-II cavities were divided into six groups (n = 12) according to the bonding mode; etch-and-rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) and application protocol of the universal adhesive (UA) employed (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake); following the manufacturer instructions (MI), manual agitation for 20 s (20s), or sonic agitation for 20 s using a modified sonic micro-brush mounted on EndoActivator device, Dentsply Sirona, (sonic). Restored teeth were sectioned into resin–dentin beams and slaps and µTBS was evaluated at 1 week (1w) and after thermocycling (10k). µTBS data were analyzed using the linear mixed-effects modeling with specific contrast (p < 0.05). The resin–dentin interfacial morphology was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. Adhesive sonic agitation resulted in significantly higher µTBS means in both E&R and SE modes, compared to MI group. The µTBS of MI group showed significant reduction upon aging when applied in SE mode. Sonic agitation was associated with enhanced adhesive infiltration into dentin specially in E&R mode. Sonic agitation of UA using modified sonic micro-brush attached to EndoActivator device significantly improved the resin–dentin µTBS and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive sonic agitation on resin–dentin micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation. Seventy-two molars with prepared class-II cavities were divided into six groups (n = 12) according to the bonding mode; etch-and-rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) and application protocol of the universal adhesive (UA) employed (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake); following the manufacturer instructions (MI), manual agitation for 20 s (20s), or sonic agitation for 20 s using a modified sonic micro-brush mounted on EndoActivator device, Dentsply Sirona, (sonic). Restored teeth were sectioned into resin–dentin beams and slaps and µTBS was evaluated at 1 week (1w) and after thermocycling (10k). µTBS data were analyzed using the linear mixed-effects modeling with specific contrast (p < 0.05). The resin–dentin interfacial morphology was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. Adhesive sonic agitation resulted in significantly higher µTBS means in both E&R and SE modes, compared to MI group. The µTBS of MI group showed significant reduction upon aging when applied in SE mode. Sonic agitation was associated with enhanced adhesive infiltration into dentin specially in E&R mode. Sonic agitation of UA using modified sonic micro-brush attached to EndoActivator device significantly improved the resin–dentin µTBS and interfacial morphology at the gingival wall of class-II cavity preparation.

KW - Adhesive application

KW - Interfacial morphology

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Resin–dentin bonding

KW - Sonic agitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139136994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3

DO - 10.1007/s10266-022-00751-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 36175718

SN - 1618-1247

VL - 111

SP - 409

EP - 419

JO - Odontology

JF - Odontology

IS - 2

ER -

Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this