Additional evidence on the relationship between an internal audit function and external audit fees in australia

H.B. Singh, David Woodliff, N. Sultana, Rick Newby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies examining the relationship between a firm's internal audit (IA) function and its audit fees have produced mixed results with suggestions of possible model mis-specification in these studies. Our analysis reveals that differences in significance for IA with audit fees is driven by the choice of variables proxying for firm size and other firm characteristics, suggesting that prior results are entangled with model specification issues. Specifically, when the sales variable is used as a measure of firm size, IA is insignificant (in explaining variations in audit fees) but subsequently becomes significant when assets and employees are used. To overcome the conflicting results, subsequent factor analysis supported a positive relationship between IA and audit fees. The most significant implication from this study is that previously reported relationships involving audit fees may be the outcome of the model adopted rather than the underlying relationship between the variable of interest and audit fees. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-39
JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

External audit
Internal audit function
Audit fees
Internal audit
Firm size
Firm characteristics
Factor analysis
Model specification
Assets
Employees
Model misspecification

Cite this

@article{c9c2f171cfaa42fca2fab1032fe90036,
title = "Additional evidence on the relationship between an internal audit function and external audit fees in australia",
abstract = "Studies examining the relationship between a firm's internal audit (IA) function and its audit fees have produced mixed results with suggestions of possible model mis-specification in these studies. Our analysis reveals that differences in significance for IA with audit fees is driven by the choice of variables proxying for firm size and other firm characteristics, suggesting that prior results are entangled with model specification issues. Specifically, when the sales variable is used as a measure of firm size, IA is insignificant (in explaining variations in audit fees) but subsequently becomes significant when assets and employees are used. To overcome the conflicting results, subsequent factor analysis supported a positive relationship between IA and audit fees. The most significant implication from this study is that previously reported relationships involving audit fees may be the outcome of the model adopted rather than the underlying relationship between the variable of interest and audit fees. {\circledC} 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
author = "H.B. Singh and David Woodliff and N. Sultana and Rick Newby",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/ijau.12009",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "27--39",
journal = "International Journal of Auditing",
issn = "1090-6738",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "1",

}

Additional evidence on the relationship between an internal audit function and external audit fees in australia. / Singh, H.B.; Woodliff, David; Sultana, N.; Newby, Rick.

In: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2014, p. 27-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additional evidence on the relationship between an internal audit function and external audit fees in australia

AU - Singh, H.B.

AU - Woodliff, David

AU - Sultana, N.

AU - Newby, Rick

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Studies examining the relationship between a firm's internal audit (IA) function and its audit fees have produced mixed results with suggestions of possible model mis-specification in these studies. Our analysis reveals that differences in significance for IA with audit fees is driven by the choice of variables proxying for firm size and other firm characteristics, suggesting that prior results are entangled with model specification issues. Specifically, when the sales variable is used as a measure of firm size, IA is insignificant (in explaining variations in audit fees) but subsequently becomes significant when assets and employees are used. To overcome the conflicting results, subsequent factor analysis supported a positive relationship between IA and audit fees. The most significant implication from this study is that previously reported relationships involving audit fees may be the outcome of the model adopted rather than the underlying relationship between the variable of interest and audit fees. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

AB - Studies examining the relationship between a firm's internal audit (IA) function and its audit fees have produced mixed results with suggestions of possible model mis-specification in these studies. Our analysis reveals that differences in significance for IA with audit fees is driven by the choice of variables proxying for firm size and other firm characteristics, suggesting that prior results are entangled with model specification issues. Specifically, when the sales variable is used as a measure of firm size, IA is insignificant (in explaining variations in audit fees) but subsequently becomes significant when assets and employees are used. To overcome the conflicting results, subsequent factor analysis supported a positive relationship between IA and audit fees. The most significant implication from this study is that previously reported relationships involving audit fees may be the outcome of the model adopted rather than the underlying relationship between the variable of interest and audit fees. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

U2 - 10.1111/ijau.12009

DO - 10.1111/ijau.12009

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 27

EP - 39

JO - International Journal of Auditing

JF - International Journal of Auditing

SN - 1090-6738

IS - 1

ER -