Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face

Gillian Rhodes, L.T. Maloney, J. Turner, L.A. Ewing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adaptation paradigms highlight the dynamic nature of face coding and suggest that identity is coded relative to an average face that is tuned by experience. In low-level vision, adaptive coding can enhance sensitivity to differences around the adapted level. We investigated whether sensitivity to differences around the average face is similarly enhanced. Converging evidence from three paradigms showed no enhancement. Discrimination of small interocular spacing differences was not better for faces close to the average (Study 1). Nor was perceived similarity reduced for face pairs close to (spanning) the average (Study 2). On the contrary, these pairs were judged most similar. Maximum likelihood perceptual difference scaling (Studies 3 and 4) confirmed that sensitivity to differences was reduced, not enhanced, around the average. We conclude that adaptive face coding does not enhance discrimination around the average face. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-989
JournalVision Research
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Low Vision

Cite this

Rhodes, Gillian ; Maloney, L.T. ; Turner, J. ; Ewing, L.A. / Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face. In: Vision Research. 2007 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 974-989.
@article{50ee2acd19b445c5899e4b827d4d97dd,
title = "Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face",
abstract = "Adaptation paradigms highlight the dynamic nature of face coding and suggest that identity is coded relative to an average face that is tuned by experience. In low-level vision, adaptive coding can enhance sensitivity to differences around the adapted level. We investigated whether sensitivity to differences around the average face is similarly enhanced. Converging evidence from three paradigms showed no enhancement. Discrimination of small interocular spacing differences was not better for faces close to the average (Study 1). Nor was perceived similarity reduced for face pairs close to (spanning) the average (Study 2). On the contrary, these pairs were judged most similar. Maximum likelihood perceptual difference scaling (Studies 3 and 4) confirmed that sensitivity to differences was reduced, not enhanced, around the average. We conclude that adaptive face coding does not enhance discrimination around the average face. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "Gillian Rhodes and L.T. Maloney and J. Turner and L.A. Ewing",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "974--989",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "7",

}

Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face. / Rhodes, Gillian; Maloney, L.T.; Turner, J.; Ewing, L.A.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2007, p. 974-989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face

AU - Rhodes, Gillian

AU - Maloney, L.T.

AU - Turner, J.

AU - Ewing, L.A.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Adaptation paradigms highlight the dynamic nature of face coding and suggest that identity is coded relative to an average face that is tuned by experience. In low-level vision, adaptive coding can enhance sensitivity to differences around the adapted level. We investigated whether sensitivity to differences around the average face is similarly enhanced. Converging evidence from three paradigms showed no enhancement. Discrimination of small interocular spacing differences was not better for faces close to the average (Study 1). Nor was perceived similarity reduced for face pairs close to (spanning) the average (Study 2). On the contrary, these pairs were judged most similar. Maximum likelihood perceptual difference scaling (Studies 3 and 4) confirmed that sensitivity to differences was reduced, not enhanced, around the average. We conclude that adaptive face coding does not enhance discrimination around the average face. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Adaptation paradigms highlight the dynamic nature of face coding and suggest that identity is coded relative to an average face that is tuned by experience. In low-level vision, adaptive coding can enhance sensitivity to differences around the adapted level. We investigated whether sensitivity to differences around the average face is similarly enhanced. Converging evidence from three paradigms showed no enhancement. Discrimination of small interocular spacing differences was not better for faces close to the average (Study 1). Nor was perceived similarity reduced for face pairs close to (spanning) the average (Study 2). On the contrary, these pairs were judged most similar. Maximum likelihood perceptual difference scaling (Studies 3 and 4) confirmed that sensitivity to differences was reduced, not enhanced, around the average. We conclude that adaptive face coding does not enhance discrimination around the average face. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.010

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 974

EP - 989

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 7

ER -