Accurate fracture modelling using meshless methods, the visibility criterion and level sets: Formulation and 2D modelling

Xiaoying Zhuang, Charles Augarde, Stéphane Bordas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fracture modelling using numerical methods is well-advanced in 2D using techniques such as the extended finite element method (XFEM). The use of meshless methods for these problems lags somewhat behind, but the potential benefits of no meshing (particularly in 3D) prompt continued research into their development. In methods where the crack face is not explicitly modelled (as the edge of an element for instance), two procedures are instead used to associate the displacement jump with the crack surface: the visibility criterion and the diffraction method. The visibility criterion is simple to implement and efficient to compute, especially with the help of level set coordinates. However, spurious discontinuities have been reported around crack tips using the visibility criterion, whereas implementing the diffraction method in 3D is much more complicated than the visibility criterion. In this paper, a tying procedure is proposed to remove the difficulty with the visibility criterion so that crack tip closure can be ensured while the advantages of the visibility criterion can be preserved. The formulation is based on the use of level set coordinates and the element-free Galerkin method, and is generally applicable for single or multiple crack problems in 2D or 3D. The paper explains the formulation and provides verification of the method against a number of 2D crack problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-268
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accurate fracture modelling using meshless methods, the visibility criterion and level sets: Formulation and 2D modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this