Accounting for crypto-assets: Stakeholders' perceptions

Jun Heng Chou, Prerana Agrawal, Jac Birt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse stakeholders’ perceptions on the accounting of crypto-assets. They also look at the need to amend/clarify existing accounting standards or develop new accounting standards. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use a qualitative approach featuring interviews with four stakeholder groups including academics, professional bodies, standard setters and accounting practitioners. Interview recordings are transcribed and then analysed through NVivo. Findings: The interviewees identify various issues in the application of current accounting standards to crypto-assets. The interviewees perceive that the rapid development of crypto-assets and fluidity hinder the development of accounting guidance. Hence, continuous monitoring by standard-setters is required. The general consensus is that unless there are crypto-assets with economic characteristics and functionality that are pervasive enough to warrant a new accounting standard, principles of current accounting standards are robust to address gaps in accounting requirements for crypto-assets. Originality/value: This study adds to the discussion on harmonising the current practices in accounting of crypto-assets. By examining perceptions of multiple stakeholder groups, this study provides insights into the applicability of current accounting standards to the classification, measurement and disclosure of crypto-assets. The findings will inform standard setters and aid their efforts towards providing formal guidance on the accounting of crypto-assets. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-489
Number of pages19
JournalStudies in Economics and Finance
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for crypto-assets: Stakeholders' perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this